Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
It is very traditional for people to choose and prefer something on a regular basis. However, nowadays, it is believed that people encounter too many options in their daily life. From my own perspective, I entirely agree with the given statement.
Firstly, it is now more common for people to face the dilemma of choosing their clothes. Compared to the past, when technologies in the fashion industry were still raw, clothes were manufactured with simple patterns. Therefore, people often made quick choices on clothes. Contrary to that, clothes nowadays have sophisticated designs with a variety of styles and modes. Hence, teenagers are more likely to spend much of their time wondering what to wear or which clothes to purchase for themselves. This creates time-wasting habits that have bad effects on people’s lifestyles. Moreover, food and cuisines are also a challenge for people, with restaurants offering too many preferences. More and more individuals confirm that they often struggle to choose what to have for their meals since there are a number of desirable options. This, however, provides people with diversified menus and recipes, making meals tastier and less boring.
Another aspect that faces a massive number of choices is job and occupation. It has been much more difficult for college students to make decisions on their future careers while having to figure out their real passion. For example, students are now exposed to many fascinating introductions about different jobs which make them feel optimistic. Therefore, they are unable to focus on a spectacular field while thinking about the others. However, we can not deny that it is beneficial for every student to have a wide range of options regarding future occupation, with that helping them discover a suitable major.
In conclusion, it is true that people nowadays face a lot of options in their life. Meanwhile, this phenomenon can produce both positive and negative effects on people.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-14 | trpg143 | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-12 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-12 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-12 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-07 | hahoaan | 89 | view |
- The plans below show the layout of a university s sports centre now and how it will look after redevelopment 73
- The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now and plans for its development 78
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011 84
- The plans below show the site of an airport now and how it will look after redevelopment next year Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, hence, however, if, moreover, regarding, so, still, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1664.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26582278481 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74299737693 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588607594937 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 527.4 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.5569313083 49.4020404114 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 87.5789473684 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6315789474 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.84210526316 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245480649365 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.07281191342 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0456729128027 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143852185913 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0608895288772 0.056905535591 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.99 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.