Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
There have been some provoking ideas regarding choices. Many people point out that we are encountering a wide range of options at the moment. From my perspective, I just partly concur with the statement, given some reconsiderations that are going to be discussed in the essay.
First, on the supporting side, it is indisputable that people are offered too many choices nowadays, which sometimes makes it complicated for individuals to have quick decisions. To be more specific, take restaurant eaters as an example, they are often given a diverse array of offers on the menus, all of which are worth trying and attractive. This leads to an increase in convenience and satisfaction for people since they can have changes in their daily meals instead of eating the same food with unchanged recipes all the time. Moreover, people also gain benefits in terms of clothes preferences for different purposes. There is a wide variety of designs from brands and retailers which are progressing to invent new products to satisfy and meet the demands of customers. Therefore, choosing a suitable outfit to put on is no longer a difficult task for many people, given the numerous options on the shelves of fashion shops.
However, the statement seems to solely work well for the wealthy people who can get access to high living standards. On the other hand, the given assessment cannot be accurately applied to those living under the poverty line. To state that, due to poor financial conditions, many people can hardly adapt luxurious choices regarding their basic commodities such as food or clothes. For instance, families living on a tight budget are more likely to purchase cheap products and steer clear of other options which are considered extravagant and unaffordable.
In conclusion, while it is undeniable that people are now entitled to a diversified list of options, I still believe that this might not be the case for those who are having poor living conditions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-09-07 | Tuan Harry | 78 | view |
| 2024-05-07 | 123456abcxyz | 78 | view |
| 2024-03-08 | MinyiChu | 84 | view |
| 2024-03-07 | MinyiChu | 67 | view |
| 2024-02-23 | MinyiChu | 56 | view |
- Many young people who leave school hold a negative attitude towards learning Why does this happen What are the solutions 78
- The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graph below shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- The plans below show the site of an airport now and how it will look after redevelopment next year Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, moreover, regarding, so, still, therefore, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1649.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 325.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07384615385 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78322277119 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603076923077 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 518.4 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.8653837843 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.785714286 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2142857143 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.78571428571 7.06120827912 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187074585342 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0617097644308 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0393463445313 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114763220772 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0305444589013 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.