Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
In this day and age, there has been a lot of change in the lifestyle of modern people. Accordingly, many people think that they are given more choices than before. From my point of view, I completely agree with this idea because there are a myriad of inventions that provide us with more competitive products with higher quality nowadays.
To begin with, thanks to globalization, people can access a huge market which is supplied by a number of companies all over the world, that means these companies need to use advanced manufacturing technology in order to offer their customers more products with cheaper prices. Bamboo Airways, for example, are a new airway in the market, but they immediately took a major market share because of domestic flights policy, which reduced airfares for customers.
By the same token, customers can take advantage of not only price, but also higher quality products from companies, since these corporations constantly upgrade their products. Although these continually advance in technology can diversify products, which leads customers to a confused situation. Eventually, better quality control will support consumers with more good offers than before.
In conclusion, with the advent of a myriad of new cutting-edge technologies, people nowadays have a great benefit of using higher standard products as well as much cheaper prices to serve their needs, that means people have a lot of choices.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-02 | celine ayoub | 67 | view |
| 2024-05-07 | 123456abcxyz | 78 | view |
| 2024-04-02 | zanzendegi | 73 | view |
| 2024-04-02 | zanzendegi | 61 | view |
| 2024-04-02 | zanzendegi | 61 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 242, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'myriads'?
Suggestion: myriads
...gree with this idea because there are a myriad of inventions that provide us with more...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, if, so, well, for example, in conclusion, as well as, to begin with, by the same token
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1212.0 1615.20841683 75% => OK
No of words: 229.0 315.596192385 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29257641921 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76423698026 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.624454148472 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 378.9 506.74238477 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 66.3923987915 49.4020404114 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.666666667 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4444444444 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.2222222222 7.06120827912 173% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148159440253 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0600797890628 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0561993083694 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0961190320072 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0675624107241 0.056905535591 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.