Some people believe that in order to improve educational quality, we should encourage students to make comments or even criticism of their teachers, but others think it will lead to the loss of respect and discipline in the classroom. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
While many individuals argue that provoking students to give reviews of their teachers is crucial to enhance the teaching quality, some would advocate that this may disorganize class rules. This essay will discuss both opinions and argue in favor of the former.
On the one hand, allowing learners to give feedback on their teachers has several drawbacks. Firstly, students, especially at a very young age, can be disrespectful and disobedient to their teachers. Teachers do not always meet the expectation of young students and can bring them discomfort occasionally. For example, if a child is encouraged to give their opinions on a compulsory subject which they do not find enjoyable, it is understandable that they will associate their teachers with it and therefore grow negative attitude towards their teachers. Secondly, it will be extremely challenging for a teacher to keep control of the class with students rising their voices constantly. This will cause an adverse affect on school sites because classrooms can become a chaos and teachers may feel stressed out because of it.
On the other hand, students commenting on their teachers may bring about positive impacts in terms of educational effectiveness. The first worth-mentioning fact is that anyone needs reviews in their career paths in order to improve and teachers are not exceptional. Students' feedback would be most suitable since they are familiar with their teacher's presenting and teaching methods. At the same time, students can give proper recommendations and pieces of advice so that teachers can deliver information more efficiently and learning sessions can be more appealing. In addition, if students feel free to express their learning experience, they are more likely to raise their hands in class and upgrade their overall productivity. In this way, students can produce better learning outcomes.
In conclusion, it is unavoidable that allowing students to give feedback on their teachers may lead to numerous problems. However, I believe that the advantages that this practice brings outweigh the disadvantages.
- Directors of large organizations earn much higher salaries than ordinary employees do Some people think it is necessary but others hold that it is unfair Discuss both views and give your own opinions 84
- The increase in the production of consumer goods results in damage to the natural environment What are the causes of this What can be done to solve this problem 84
- Studying with a group of students in a classroom is more beneficial than learning online at home To what extent do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 61
- Some people think that printed books are no longer necessary in this digital era as all writing can be stored electronically Others think that printed books still play important roles Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- The table shows forested land in millions of hectares in different parts of the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should spend about 20 minutes on this task 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 715, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
... constantly. This will cause an adverse affect on school sites because classrooms can bec...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...an produce better learning outcomes. In conclusion, it is unavoidable that allo...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 24.0651302605 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1782.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4495412844 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96489134129 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538226299694 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 529.2 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.1982396174 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.375 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4375 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.25 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231525346634 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.082661914877 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0400970429809 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142695897331 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0206013635047 0.056905535591 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.