The issue as to whether people who have high-quality certifications in a range of decisive expertise such as doctors and engineers should work in their country to contribute or should go on studying abroad after a tertiary education has remained a source of controversy. Personally, I would agree with two sides in these situations.
On the one hand, we have to recognize the notion that Living in their country to be the beginning of a career path from now on will bring them many advantageous impacts because of its convenience and flexibility. In terms of personal life, They will have much time to union with their family after a heavy workload and wait for a long time owing to the traffic jams on peak hours after time off work. They all need to be a shoulder to share their emotions and the hardships they had suffered. So on, they will get that allowed time with their family. In terms of moving around, They don't live far away from home and can commute easily, simultaneously, the reduction of fuel and saving costs of shopping needs are the contributors to cover a part of daily expenses with those that have normal or sufficient wages.
On the other hand, I would side steadily with those who think that having a high-quality chosen profession should have the freedom to work in another country. Despite the fact that they suffered from obstacles about isolation or loneliness when they meet no relatives. So I still hold fast to the belief that It will make more useful merits than working in home life. First of all, your access to soft skills such as analytical skills, thought-provoking, interpersonal communication, and Independence is a key role in point will be more responsible for your life and are seasoned with experience to give some decisions in both life and work. Furthermore, You will improve your English skills and detail other languages to serve the needs of an increasingly integrated market among developed countries. This can result in being committed to an international organization to receive a salary that is many times higher than working in home life.
In conclusion, Working in the country where they were trained or working in developed countries after tertiary education all bring them significant merits. However, Each person should choose the best decision as well as meet the needs of their interests to not appear as counterproductive situations.
- It is more important for school children to learn about local history than world history To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- It is better for college students to live far away from home than live at home with their parents Do you agree or disagree 78
- The society would benefit from a ban on all forms of advertising because it serves no useful purpose and can even be damaging To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 84
- In some cultures children are often told that they can achieve anything if they try hard enough What are the advantages and disadvantages of giving children this message 84
- Some people think it is more important to spend money on roads and motorways than on public transport systems To what extent do you agree 89
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 11, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
The issue as to whether people who have high-quality certificat...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 583, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...family. In terms of moving around, They dont live far away from home and can commute...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, so, still, well, as to, in conclusion, such as, as well as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 68.0 41.998997996 162% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1995.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 403.0 315.596192385 128% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95037220844 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48049772903 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90548151007 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 176.041082164 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565756823821 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 625.5 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 68.6844637131 49.4020404114 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.0 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8666666667 20.7667163134 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.6 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.326746874858 0.244688304435 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10346168907 0.084324248473 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0671099169705 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202199007307 0.151304729494 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0228939456318 0.056905535591 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 11, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
The issue as to whether people who have high-quality certificat...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 583, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...family. In terms of moving around, They dont live far away from home and can commute...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, so, still, well, as to, in conclusion, such as, as well as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 68.0 41.998997996 162% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1995.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 403.0 315.596192385 128% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95037220844 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48049772903 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90548151007 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 176.041082164 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565756823821 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 625.5 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 68.6844637131 49.4020404114 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.0 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8666666667 20.7667163134 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.6 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.326746874858 0.244688304435 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10346168907 0.084324248473 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0671099169705 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202199007307 0.151304729494 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0228939456318 0.056905535591 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.