Some people believe that to protect local culture tourism should be banned in some areas Whereas others think that change is inevitable and banning tourism will have no benefits Discuss both and give your opinion

A segment of society opines that prohibiting tourism may prevent cultural loss in some regions while others believe that it does not have any effects. This essay will further discuss both facets with appropriate examples then draw a logical conclusion.

People who favor banning tourism often point out that the duration of the prohibition allows local customs to revitalize. Taking some ethnic groups settling in the mountainous areas in the north of Vietnam as a prominent example. Supposing swarms of holidaymakers from China had not been banned from coming there, a large proportion of indigenous people would abandon their traditional weaving customs to find other jobs in order to provide tourist services now.

In certain areas, acculturation is good as it helps get rid of depraved costumes. Therefore, a legislation preventing the influx of tourists would even have no positive outcomes. In some regions in China, eating bats alive had been a norm until some western seeds and groceries were brought to the regions by tourists. Also, cultural assimilation helped mitigate gender inequality in Vietnam inasmuch as local young people learn how women were treated equitably from Europeans.

A paradigm shift to responsible tourism that takes a social aspect into account may effectively ameliorate the issue. By encouraging people to buy souvenirs from local stores, organizing some activities and lessons like learning how to make pottery, locals can generate money from tourism while preserving their cultural identities. Also, sustainable tourism development may make a destination more appealing to visitors because of its distinctive characteristic, thus bring in more money to the host country

To conclude, instead of banning, visitors should be allowed to draw to different places, but as a form of sustainable tourism.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, then, therefore, thus, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1564.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.50704225352 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85944111521 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.669014084507 0.561755894193 119% => OK
syllable_count: 492.3 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.8032457377 49.4020404114 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.333333333 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6666666667 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 7.06120827912 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296704946262 0.244688304435 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.089121598604 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0518909391723 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145632546621 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0385645015226 0.056905535591 68% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.39 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.