Some people believe that restoration of old buildings costs too much we should demolish them and build new ones instead To what extent do you agree or disagree

Should the historical buildings not given national importance? As a matter of fact, many a man more often than not suggest that new structure should be erected in the place of traditional building owing to the high maintenance cost of the latter ones. However, I completely dissent from the idea because establishment of new buildings would not only involve huge monetary investments, but demolishing the old ones would result in losing of highly significant cultural heritage.

Arguably, traditional historical buildings such as museums, caves, Kings Palaces and so on do not have such popularity for no reason. While the preservation of this building contributed greatly in the saving of cultural values, it also helps to establish a connection of new generation with their rich ancient history. What is more, cultural heritages are the only sources to transfer the values and knowledge of history from existing to upcoming generation. For an example in Europe,
government of Europe who have preserved the first building made in 4800 BC to connect their people with their ancient roots.

Apart from that making the new buildings instead of preserving the old ones would lead to huge investment of money. Apart from it, it could become a bigger cause of pollution because constructing of these buildings would end up with huge volume of dust in the air. In order to escape from the traditional buildings restoration cost concerned authorities could collect the money from visitors in the form of entrance fee. Through this, maintenance cost can be overcome and there would be no need to demolish the traditional historical monuments. A painstaking research has had been undertaken by the United Nation Organisation in which they unfold the fact that more than half of the country charge minimal entrance fee from the tourist just to cover their restoration cost.

To conclude, but for any doubt, it is asserted that historical monuments are a great source of gaining knowledge about the ancient period ,so it becomes imperative to preserve them. However, if people and government tourism authorities will collaborate to save their heritages it would eventually lead to socially stable and culturally prosperous society; lest good outcomes should be far out of reach.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 485, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng generation. For an example in Europe, government of Europe who have preserved ...
^^^
Line 6, column 307, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'buildings'' or 'building's'?
Suggestion: buildings'; building's
...In order to escape from the traditional buildings restoration cost concerned authorities ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 547, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'painstaking research'.
Suggestion: Painstaking research
...h the traditional historical monuments. A painstaking research has had been undertaken by the United N...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 757, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...fee from the tourist just to cover their restoration cost. To conclude, but fo...
^^
Line 8, column 73, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...it is asserted that historical monuments are a great source of gaining knowledge ...
^^
Line 8, column 139, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ining knowledge about the ancient period ,so it becomes imperative to preserve the...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, while, apart from, such as, as a matter of fact, what is more

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1918.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 365.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25479452055 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37092360658 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8456113969 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 176.041082164 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583561643836 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 594.0 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.3674903832 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.0 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0714285714 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.85714285714 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225926367927 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0818756648543 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0487532700164 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117853950144 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0586564774456 0.056905535591 103% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.