Some people believe that smartphones are destroying social interaction To what extent do you agree or disagree

Essay topics:

Some people believe that smartphones are destroying social interaction. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Many people think that mobile phones are vanishing social life. I personally agree with the statement, although smartphones made life easy, as well as, it has lowered active social life and has become an addiction.

To begin with, in recent times, mobile phones especially smartphones have become a valuable tool for communication, education and entertainment. People spends hours a day on their smartphones. Since,smartphones came in existence, because of its excessive use people ruins their personal relationship. For example, it is quite common to find a group of youngster sitting together in a place talking on phone to people far away instead of cultivating new friendship. Thus, this behaviour and this virtual networking, weakens their social interactions.

Furthermore, the excessive use of smartphones adversely affects the student's education, social development and health. It vitiates the academic environment. Mobile phones not only distract student but also the teachers during the class. Youngsters spend their precious time on social platforms rather than participating in schools cultural activities and competitions. For instance, children posts their photos and videos on social networking sites such as Instagram, YouTube to be famous, though they neglect the friends they have in school. Hence, smartphones diminished social life from young ones to elderly completely.

In conclusion, although mobile gadgetry helps people in numerous ways , yet it devastated their social life.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-12-08 ankushgurumaa 78 view
2024-11-30 Trần Ánh Vy 73 view
2024-11-26 Trần Ánh Vy 84 view
2024-11-26 Huyenlbg87 11 view
2024-11-24 hahoaan 78 view
>>> More users practiced this topic >>>
Essay Categories
IELTS Writing Task II - IELTS Academic
Essays by user kashyap sahil :
>>> more essays by the user >>>

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 199, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , smartphones
... hours a day on their smartphones. Since,smartphones came in existence, because of its exces...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 69, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...se of smartphones adversely affects the students education, social development and healt...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 562, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... they have in school. Hence, smartphones diminished social life from young ones t...
^^
Line 7, column 40, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... In conclusion, although mobile gadgetry helps people in numerous ways , yet it d...
^^
Line 7, column 71, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... gadgetry helps people in numerous ways , yet it devastated their social life.
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, if, so, thus, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 13.1623246493 23% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 41.998997996 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1287.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 222.0 315.596192385 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.7972972973 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 4.20363070211 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10012425161 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.684684684685 0.561755894193 122% => OK
syllable_count: 387.9 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.253323923 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.9285714286 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8571428571 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.07142857143 7.06120827912 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1621365455 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0581298997311 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0360520260874 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105364419253 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0198874142401 0.056905535591 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.06 12.4159519038 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.57 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 199, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , smartphones
... hours a day on their smartphones. Since,smartphones came in existence, because of its exces...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 69, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...se of smartphones adversely affects the students education, social development and healt...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 562, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... they have in school. Hence, smartphones diminished social life from young ones t...
^^
Line 7, column 40, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... In conclusion, although mobile gadgetry helps people in numerous ways , yet it d...
^^
Line 7, column 71, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... gadgetry helps people in numerous ways , yet it devastated their social life.
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, if, so, thus, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 13.1623246493 23% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 41.998997996 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1287.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 222.0 315.596192385 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.7972972973 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 4.20363070211 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10012425161 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.684684684685 0.561755894193 122% => OK
syllable_count: 387.9 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.253323923 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.9285714286 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8571428571 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.07142857143 7.06120827912 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1621365455 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0581298997311 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0360520260874 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105364419253 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0198874142401 0.056905535591 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.06 12.4159519038 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.57 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.