In some countries many people suffer from health problems due to eating too much fast food. It is, therefore, necessary for government to impose a higher tax on this kind of food. Do you agree or disagree?
It is argued that government should levy a tariff on junk food because the health risk associated with consuming this kind of food are rising. This assay agree that a higher rate of tax should be paid by fast-food companies. Firstly, alcohol and tobacco companies already pay higher taxes; secondly, higher taxes could raise the prices and lower consumption.
Higher excise on liquor and cigarettes has proven to curb the harm caused by the substances. This revenue has been used to treat health problem associated with these products and has proven useful in advertising campaigns warning people about the dangers of alcohol and use. Tax from the fast food can be used in the same way. The United Kingdom is a prime example, where money from smokers is used to treat lung cancer and heart disease.
Increasing taxes would raise prices and lower consumption. Fast food companies would pass on these taxes to consumer in the form of higher prices, leading to people not being able to afford junk food because it is too expensive. Junk food would soon become a luxury item, and it would only be consumed occasionally which would be less harmful to the general public's health. For instance, the cost of organic food has been proven prohibitively expensive for most people, and that is why a small percentage of the population buys it regularly.
In conclusion, junk food should be taxed at a higher rate because of the good precedent set by alcohol and tobacco and the fact that the increased cost should reduce amount of fast food people buy.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-30 | kashyap sahil | 61 | view |
| 2023-03-28 | cinderel | 56 | view |
| 2022-11-03 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2021-07-12 | Navjotsingh21819@gmail.com | 56 | view |
| 2021-03-08 | elisabetta_fedele | 61 | view |
- People should look after their health for personal benefits rather than a duty for a society What extent do you agree or disagree 78
- The line graph shows energy consumption by fuel type in the United States from 1980 2008 78
- The graph shows the number of tourists to a Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 56
- Fever young people play sports these days Why is this Whatcan be done to encourage more young people to do sports 61
- Some people believe that smartphones are destroying social interaction To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 155, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'agrees'.
Suggestion: agrees
...his kind of food are rising. This assay agree that a higher rate of tax should be pai...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 191, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to junk'
Suggestion: to junk
...ding to people not being able to afford junk food because it is too expensive. Junk ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 359, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'publics'' or 'public's'?
Suggestion: publics'; public's
...ch would be less harmful to the general publics health. For instance, the cost of organ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, in the same way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1286.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87121212121 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44793113676 2.80592935109 87% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.537878787879 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 393.3 506.74238477 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.4252685028 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.166666667 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.91666666667 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.29030116514 0.244688304435 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115047701763 0.084324248473 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0742791006951 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183975332761 0.151304729494 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0513650035419 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.