It must be admitted that learning is not only about acquisition of knowledge, but a lot more than that as well. In this backdrop some people maintain that students should always focus on group study rather than individual learning. I agree with this statement to a greater extent. My arguments are in the following grounds.
Primarily, group approach to learning has become the need of the hour. To substantiate, present world demands employees with better personality skills along with qualifications and experience. Among such skills,cooperation and team spirit are to be occupied by everyone. Nobody is able to achieve these traits unless they practice these from their childhood. Therefore, group study matters a lot as it motivates students to share ideas, to communicate properly, and to possess leadership skills. Those students who followed a group strategy never face any difficulties in future career.
However, it is not wise to force students to always learn in groups. Effective learning requires processing of the learned information independently. For instance, a student always study with friends may find difficulty in decision making. In such a context, they have to learn personally as well.
In conclusion, learning in a group is always better because it helps pupils to gain several qualities. There is a greater need to learn such qualities as well. Nevertheless, they need to learn individually as well for developing their independence. Anyway, maximum time can be devoted for group learning.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 211, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , cooperation
...ations and experience. Among such skills,cooperation and team spirit are to be occupied by e...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
anyway, but, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, therefore, well, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1289.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 239.0 315.596192385 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39330543933 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05816812652 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.619246861925 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 389.7 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.2975951904 64% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.1977286736 49.4020404114 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 71.6111111111 106.682146367 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.2777777778 20.7667163134 64% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.16666666667 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.291679080126 0.244688304435 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0839223380041 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0856940437086 0.0667982634062 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182948719893 0.151304729494 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0892234899579 0.056905535591 157% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.0946893788 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.28 50.2224549098 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.09 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.1190380762 71% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.