Some people believe that students should be allowed to evaluate and criticise their teachers to improve the quality of education. Others think this is disrespectful to teachers. Discuss both views, give your opinion and include relevant examples.
Teachers are called the nation builders in this modern world. Presently, given allowance to students to evaluate and criticise their teachers for superiority in the education is thought to be worthwhile by some masses. By contrast, others ponder it a disgraceful act towards the dignity of the most honourable the teachers. Here, I would like to account for both sides with my own perception.
Numerous points can be put down to shore up the former view. First and foremost, less dynamic attitudes of the teachers are responsible to encourage students to criticise the teaching patterns. To be specific, the teachers especially in thriving nations do not welcome the effective and innovative methods of teaching due to the conventional attitudes. Therefore, the modern students who want freedom to raise their voice are dissatisfied and against the teaching approach which could be the positive development for better results. Besides this, most of teachers do not modify their way of teaching according to the strength and weakness of the students. Thus, lack of understanding and adjustment with teachers might be motivational factor to criticise their teachers for some students. Consequently, the majority of people want the learners to possess right to evaluate the teachers. On the contrary, others have conflicting arguments.
They think that conferring freedom to students could be disgraceful for the image of teachers. To illustrate, sometime, teachers have to be very strict towards less obedient students and therefore some ill-mannered students may criticise to their teachers to cause humiliation to them. Thus, it can not only discourage the control of a teacher but also gloom their status. Moreover, the teachers are expected to remain under fear if the power of evaluation is given to the students. As a result, they might be helpless to reveal their instinctive expression and depict their original potential.
From my notion, 'every sword has two edges'. Authority given to students about evaluating their teachers appears to be a valuable idea to boost work efficiency and productivity. However, it is anticipated to be a night mare for the teacher's abilities. Instead of giving full right to students, management must receive feedback from students about teaching ways and overall impact of the teachers and take the initiative to make the optimum selection.
To recapitulate, without the quality teachers, life is like 'a ship without sailor'. Therefore, the appointment of faculties requires deep observation and combined suggestions to make the supreme selections.
- Some sports are extremely dangerous but many people still like them very much Why do people take part in dangerous sports Give some suggestions on how to deal with these dangers Give reason for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own e 78
- Some people think that children should learn to obey and do as parents and teachers say. Others think that this kind of upbringing will not prepare our children for real life. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 93
- Nowadays in some countries the numbers of children aged 15 and younger are increasing What are the current and future effects of ever increasing population 77
- " success means the desire was strong enough". To what extend do you agree with this statement? Give reasons for your answer? 80
- These days the fashions in clothing are constantly changing Is this affecting individuals and the environment in positive or a negative way Give reasons for your answer and support by giving examples 74
Comments
Now check sir You are so
Now check sir
You are so helpful and deserve appreciation.
Now check sir and rate it
Now check sir and rate it
You are so helpful and deserve appreciation.
Full essay evaluations
Sentence: By contrast, others ponder it a disgraceful act towards the dignity of the most honourable the teachers.
Description: The tag an adjective is not usually followed by the
Suggestion: Refer to honourable and the
might be motivational factor
might be a/the motivational factor
Sentence: Thus, it can not only discourage the control of a teacher but also gloom their status.
Description: A noun, singular, common is not usually followed by a determiner, possessive
Suggestion: Refer to gloom and their
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 6.5 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 3 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 23 15
No. of Words: 404 350
No. of Characters: 2135 1500
No. of Different Words: 220 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.483 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.285 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.871 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 168 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 144 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 117 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 58 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 17.565 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.106 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.522 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.289 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.483 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.045 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Sentence: By contrast, others ponder it a disgraceful act towards the dignity of the most honourable the teachers.
Description: The tag an adjective is not usually followed by the
Suggestion: Refer to honourable and the
the modern students are dissatisfied who want freedom to raise their voice
the modern students who want freedom to raise their voice are dissatisfied
They establish that
They think that
They believe that
regarding selection of teachers.
regarding the selection of teachers.
to have best selection of the teacher.
to have the best selection of the teacher.
appears to be valuable idea
appears to be a valuable idea
flaws:
No. of Grammatical Errors: 6 2
The third paragraph is not exactly right on the topic. It is not about the selection of teachers, but whether 'it is disrespectful to teachers'
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: ? out of 9
Category: ? Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 6 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 24 15
No. of Words: 421 350
No. of Characters: 2255 1500
No. of Different Words: 233 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.53 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.356 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.854 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 183 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 155 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 122 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 62 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 17.542 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.232 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.542 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.283 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.477 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.035 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5