Some people believe that technology such as mobile phones is destroying social interactions. To what extent do you agree or disagree
In contemporary settings, technology become too vast which includes numerous issues. Therefore, few of the individuals consern that the innovations become lead to plenty of social distractions. I completely agree with this notion and reasons are examplyfed in the paragraphs below.
To begin with, in present duration, technology become major part of daily basis which includes their advanced innovations of mobile phones which are highly processed by internet access. Due to this, most of the individuals become netizen. In this criteria, masses utilise their mobile phones for their all sets of tasks. For instance, there are too many websites which are available in these gadgets such as Amazon, flipkart and plenty of shoping sites. In such manner, these sites are available for all items such as groceries, clothing, furniture and so on with affordable prices. Due to which, individuals prefer to buy all necessary items through these sites and pay via online methods in comparison to go in supermarkets or malls to purchase theirs daily needs. As a result, this criteria recognise them towards lazyness and many other distractions from the society. Because, they avoid to travel for distance and any physical effort, due to which they become unaware from their surrounding environment.
In the second place, the another factor is avoidance of their family members and neighbouring to. Because, in that particular manner, individual prefer to communicate with the liking of online sites such as video conferences or chats so on. In this manner, they avoid the guidance of their parents and grandparents and also believe that they are good for nothing. Therefore, they appreciate to utilise their leisure time on social sites such as whatsapp, instagram and so on instead of to conversate with their family. Due to this, their bonding and understanding with their close once lead to decline due to their huge interaction with electronic gadgets sich as mobile phones. As a result, they face many causes due to this, one of the major issue is low in mentality, restriction on physical growth due to less physical tasks or outdoor ways.
To recapitulate, it seems to me as that although innovation of mobile phones become basic need. However, this shows plenty of negative aspects such as social distractions, make individuals lazy and lose their bonds with their love once and so on.
- Some people believe that technology such as mobile phones is destroying social interactions To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Some people think the spread of multinational companies and globalization produce positive outcomes for everyone Do you agree or disagree with the statement 61
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes in billion of telephone calls in the UK divided into three categories from 1995 to 2002 73
- In past museums stored information about the culture and history However nowadays this information can be found on internet And therefore there is no need for the museum Do you agree or disagree 73
- Nowadays young people are admiring media and sports stars even though they do not set a good example Do you think this is a positive or negative development 81
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 243, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...t of the individuals become netizen. In this criteria, masses utilise their mobile p...
^^^^
Line 2, column 781, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...rchase theirs daily needs. As a result, this criteria recognise them towards lazynes...
^^^^
Line 3, column 381, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'appreciate utilising'.
Suggestion: appreciate utilising
...y are good for nothing. Therefore, they appreciate to utilise their leisure time on social sites such...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, second, so, therefore, for instance, such as, as a result, to begin with, in the second place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 24.0651302605 162% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 65.0 41.998997996 155% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2004.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 386.0 315.596192385 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19170984456 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43248042346 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75512745038 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.515544041451 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 637.2 506.74238477 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.940548016 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.473684211 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3157894737 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.68421052632 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.103240454827 0.244688304435 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0367135495554 0.084324248473 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0290691273076 0.0667982634062 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0754454642573 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0135773962645 0.056905535591 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.