Some people believe that teenagers should be required to do unpaid work in their free time. this can be benefit teenagers and the community as well. To what extend do you agree or disagree?
In this day and age, children are intendedly considered as the backbone of every country. Hence, it is highly debatable that teens should be fostered to do volunteer community jobs in their own spare time because it makes an important contribution to bringing wealth of benefits for a flourished society as well as children’s individual growth. I find myself in complete agreement with this statement.
To begin with, it is common that social works are associated with the individual develop of youngsters. By involving in these various kinds of helping tasks support significantly children to assimilate loads of knowledge from the environment, especially their own peers and people surrounded them. Besides that, they are more likely to being converted in terms of their characteristics and perspectives to goad oriented adults in near future. Not only that but, it also leads them to be the responsible and disciplined generations with necessary and good abilities. For example, some schoolchildren tend to take a year off before enrolling universities or colleges to take part in volunteer organizations. By doing so, they not only have valuable chances to experience intriguing tasks in the real world, but also these social works have improved their kindness, caring, patient and humility as well as target oriented youth.
In addition, by participating in unpaid jobs, they can create more intriguing and strong points for their own profile. This play a pivotal role in attracting the attentions of schools or universities’ representatives that they have applied. These volunteer tasks may make a paramount contribution to getting scholarships of children and create more global opportunities in their future careers. Furthermore, teenagers’ community works could impact on the stability of a society. Loads of positive messages coupled with assimilated social skills and knowledge in diverse sectors would likely reduce the number of crimes, robberies, sexual harassments and so on in a nation.
In conclusion, it is crystal clear that involving in non-profit organizations has positive results for young adults with respect to enriching their abilities and getting more valuable chances. Similarly, it may help society by lowest violence indirectly.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-03-04 | ilanimisaki | 61 | view |
| 2021-06-26 | singh798 | 84 | view |
| 2021-06-13 | Minty@1411 | 89 | view |
- Scientific research should be carried out and controlled by the governments rather than private companies Do you agree or disagree 84
- Some people believe that teenagers should be required to do unpaid work in their free time this can be benefit teenagers and the community as well To what extend do you agree or disagree 89
- The charts show school expenditure and the proportion of students who gained higher education diplomas and degrees in Singapore from 2000 to 2012 67
- The bar chart shows the percentage of small medium and large companies which used social media for business purposes between 2012 and 2016 73
- The graphs below show the cinema attendants in Australia and the average cinema visits by different age groups from 1996 to 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 256, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... society by lowest violence indirectly.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, furthermore, hence, if, may, similarly, so, well, for example, in addition, in conclusion, as well as, to begin with, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1928.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 348.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.54022988506 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14816129514 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.600574712644 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 594.0 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.6730129865 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.5 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5625 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195654426381 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0537044822616 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0519537949181 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106422280696 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0599776458674 0.056905535591 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.62 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.