It is often said that the punishments for someone who commit a crime should be standardized despite some people believe that establishing an individual disposal for each crime is better. This essay will discuss both viewpoints and express my opinions.
To begin with, people reckon that the advantages of standardized punishments considerably outweigh the disadvantages. The main reason of this belief is that it is cheaper to manage and more efficient. Parking tickets may be a good illustration. If every one of these cases have to attend to court as well as be ruled by the judge, the cost of this measurement will be extremely high and the time of judgement is wasted. Therefore, standardized handling may save the expense effectively and be fairer since the judgement of each one is treated with the same regardless the race and gender.
On the other hand, it is also possible to measure the crime with the separate situation and motivation. Sometimes, people is forced to commit a crime about murder due to reasons like self-defense. Obviously, this should be an independent case for the crime. Furthermore, treating of crime should be divided to different species clearly, such as a poor guy who steals the food on supermarket as he need to feed his family should not be punished compared with someone who steals a car because he wants to show wealthy.
In conclusion, both policies exist the merits on different circumstances. However, I tend to think that it is more important to keep the safety than saving money, so making case-by-case settlement for the penalty would be the better measurement.
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010. 56
- The chart below shows the percentage of people who ate five portions of fruit and vegetables per day in the UK from 2001 to 2008 11
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free. Do you think the advantages of charging for admission outweigh the disadvantages? 61
- The pie charts beloww show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000. 61
- The plans below show the layout of a university's sports centre now, and how it will look after redevelopment.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, may, so, therefore, well, in conclusion, such as, as well as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1344.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01492537313 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96744795784 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.597014925373 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 423.9 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.1096598955 49.4020404114 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.384615385 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6153846154 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.69230769231 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.338974041189 0.244688304435 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110859023046 0.084324248473 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.128735356302 0.0667982634062 193% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208501661448 0.151304729494 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.120948813468 0.056905535591 213% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.