Breaking the law is an everyday thing! The only difference is the magnitude of the committed offence, however, others suggest that there should be a fixed penalty; while, some think the reason for committing the crime should be looked at. This essay agrees that the reason for committing offence should not be overlooked. Further relevant scenarios will be given, as well as, highlighting the cause of some crimes.
There are many people who are jailed for the crimes they did not commit. It is socially agreed tha with a good lawyer, one is a free person. One can be used as a scapegoat for other people's offences. For instance in most under-developed countries there are illegal money changers who are given large sums of money to sell in the streets. The big fish can never face justice, if the scapegoat is apprehended and the later will be charged alone.
Furthermore, knowledge is power. Looking at people who live in the outermost and backward rural areas they are not knowledgeable of some cultural practises they do which are illegal. For example, in Binga a rural area in Zimbabwe, they used to practise genital mutilation for young girls which is an initiation into womanhood.This was done against the girl's will. When the Girl Child Network advocated Muzvare Betty Makoni started educating the community, there was a decrease in number of girls being initiated.
In addition, mental disability is also the most common of death crimes. Mentally ill patients cannot discern between good and bad, therefore they are a threat to the community so punishment is unfruitful, instead they are admitted into a psychiatric unit. For instance, in our rural area there was a certain man who was mentally ill. He killed his own father as he accused him of the death of his cattle which he never owned.
However, to a certain extent some offences should have a fixed punishment. It must come as a lesson to others that crimes are not tolerated. Harsh punishments can be given. For instance, issue of Suddam Hussein who was beheaded due to masscres of people. There is no justification for masscres of people.
In my perspective, all crimes should be examined before judgement is delivered. Some people can be setup for the crime or commit it unknowingly. Punishment should take into account the reason for committing the crime.
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 61
- The bar chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school. Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages? 73
- The process that is used to manufacture the bricks for a building industry. 73
- Life cycle of a frog 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 375, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ts. The big fish can never face justice, if the scapegoat is apprehended and the ...
^^
Line 5, column 327, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: This
...s which is an initiation into womanhood.This was done against the girls will. When t...
^^^^
Line 7, column 193, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...threat to the community so punishment is unfruitful, instead they are admitted in...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, look, so, therefore, well, while, for example, for instance, in addition, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 35.0 13.1623246493 266% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1948.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 393.0 315.596192385 125% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95674300254 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45244063426 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71341804832 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552162849873 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 619.2 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 16.0721442886 149% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.1788295056 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.1666666667 106.682146367 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.375 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.83333333333 7.06120827912 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 16.0 3.9879759519 401% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.382142830696 0.244688304435 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113912186292 0.084324248473 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109601248936 0.0667982634062 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.221727667561 0.151304729494 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.143238115555 0.056905535591 252% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.0946893788 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.19 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.