Some people believe that tourists should accept social and environmental responsibility while others believe that tourists should not accept any responsibility at all. What is your opinion?
As the population grows and with the help of new technology, more people are tending to travel to other countries as a tourist. While some individuals believe that tourists should be responsible for social and environment of the visiting countries, others dismiss them as they think it is not related to tourists. Admittedly, I am of the opinion that tourists must accept social and environmental responsibility of other countries for a number of compelling reason.
The most rational justification is that tourists are entering to a new culture and new environment. That is, visiting new countries, tourists must accept the host people’s culture and traditions to avoid any conflicts. To put it differently, if tourists did not want to take any social responsibility, it could cause a lot of problems such as cultural conflicts. Take a country as an example where tourists wear a T-shirt which has a special religious drawing, although wearing it may not cause problem in most of the countries, in some countries especially religious countries, it may lead to misunderstanding and cultural conflicts with local people.
Yet another compelling argument is that it could have severe consequences for tourists as they might break a law. That is to say, not being familiar with a law of a certain country, the people who travel to those countries might end up in jail. For example, in some countries like Singapore chewing a gum and throw it into the street is against the law. Therefore, if individuals who visit this country were not to respect the environment of that country, it could have a perennial problem for them such as having a criminal record under their names.
To sum up, to be on a safe side and avoid any severe problems. I strongly support the idea that tourists must accept the social and environmental responsibility of a country. This mainly because, by avoiding the respect to the host country, the serious repercussions would take its toll on the tourists at the first place.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-05-19 | gur1040894 | 61 | view |
| 2021-05-19 | gur1040894 | 56 | view |
| 2021-05-19 | gur1040894 | 56 | view |
| 2021-05-19 | gur1040894 | 56 | view |
| 2019-11-21 | Darsh patel | 78 | view |
- Some people claim that public museums and art galleries are not needed because people can see historical objects and works of art using a computer Do you agree with this opinion 87
- A growing number of people feel that animals should to be exploited by people and they should have the same rights as humans, while others argue that humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs, including uses for food and research discuss b 73
- Today more and more tourists are visiting places where conditions are difficult, such as the Sahara desert or the Antarctic?What are the benefits and disadvantages for tourists who visit such places? 73
- Many students have to study subjects they do not like. Some people think this is a complete waste of time.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 61
- In developing countries, children in rural communities have less access to education. Some people believe that the problem can be solved by providing more schools and teachers, while others think that the problem can be solved by providing computers and I 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, may, so, therefore, while, for example, such as, to sum up, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1672.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 334.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00598802395 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03960494969 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.497005988024 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 508.5 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.383787802 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.428571429 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8571428571 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.07142857143 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.317026817363 0.244688304435 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115933787066 0.084324248473 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10760156242 0.0667982634062 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204029502788 0.151304729494 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.141114396378 0.056905535591 248% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.