There is no denying the fact that the social and environment more crucial in day to day in gunman beings lives. In the modern era, but few masses believe that visitors should be care social and environmentally responsibly in other side people said that not only duty of the visitors. I disagree with the given notion and I will examine my perspective views in the upcoming paragraph.
To commence with the factor of notion, there are considerable of the factor behind of rubric for doing protection of the social and environmental. Nowadays, the care of the surrounding area is tremendously significant in the world. However, there are coming visitors from another country to spend laser time. They are gathering information about the various culture. owing to this, they are doing care of the place .So, doing protection is necessary for the social and environment to them. This, if the environment social place is dual instead of bad impact on our economy.
On another side, the individual said that, the doing maintenance of social and the environment by living masses. Because visitors are spending more money on their lives due to they do not care. In addition, they are doing spend time without any responsibility. For instance, it is looking at on tourist area keep of security hard and made if community members, who are duty for maintenance of there. Resultingly, the acceptance of the duty of the community centre.
To recapitulate, I personally aver that responsibility of the environmentally and socially shoul be taken by visitors because it is fruitful for humankind and the place.
- When familiy have a meal together It is consider as social activity Do u agree that eating together is important to the people of your country 56
- the bar chart below shows the percentage of men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 67
- The graphs below show the percentage of household energy used and the amount of greenhouse gases produced in Australia Summarise the information making comparisons where relevant 67
- The bar chart shows the percentage of the total world population in four countries in 1950 and 2002 and projections for 2050 73
- Nowadays older people who need employment have to compete with younger people What problems does this cause and what are the solutions 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 179, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'cared'?
Suggestion: cared
... masses believe that visitors should be care social and environmentally responsibly ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 368, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Owing
... information about the various culture. owing to this, they are doing care of the pla...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 415, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...o this, they are doing care of the place .So, doing protection is necessary for th...
^^
Line 3, column 417, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: So
...this, they are doing care of the place .So, doing protection is necessary for the ...
^^
Line 5, column 114, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...l and the environment by living masses. Because visitors are spending more money on the...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 362, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...ity hard and made if community members, who are duty for maintenance of there. Resultin...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, so, for instance, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1340.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05660377358 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97598313404 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.535849056604 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 436.5 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.0817590111 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.3333333333 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6666666667 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.53333333333 7.06120827912 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197530607515 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0554582176597 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0590002142298 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113279030713 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0439855822426 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.77 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.