Young generation is the precious asset for any society, without whom it would never thrive. Nowadays, schools arrange mandatory non-paid social activity for youngsters to make them face with the realities of their surrounding world and provoke sense of responsible in their conscious. However, some people takes issue with this educational policy and believe that it is counterproductive for teenagers. I agree this is a beneficial action due to two major reasons which I intend to provide in the following essay.
First and for most, I strongly am in the conviction that this action could benefit students in terms of social abilities, especially in process of formation of under tacking the responsibilities in the community the will soon enter to it. I recently have read an article about this crucial subject in which scientists have studied the correlation coefficient between obligatory charity activities and the level of responsibility in a young group of secondary school students. This research obviously reveals that there is an undeniable connection within these two criteria.
Second, experiencing the real world atmosphere, i.e. charities, though a controlled environment like programs under the supervision of school, would help youth generation to become familiar to the reality of outside world and could pop the illusion bubble of their pre-judgment about their society. My own experience is a good case in point. When I was a teenage boy, I was a perfectionist and used to have a false imagination about the world, until our school forced us to go to a less than a wealthy neighborhood and distribute food among poor. This event not only has had a profound impact on me but it also has helped me to adjust my perspective to my society much more realistically. Science then, this tremendous incident has provoked sense of empathy in my conscience. Had not I witnessed that atmosphere, I would have never realized about the real meaning of poverty.
Overall, as I mentioned, I totally share this attitude for two important facts. This serves as both students’ social character booster and their reality vision adjuster. Eye must not be lost of this fact that this practice needs to be executed under direct petrol of the school’s officials, owing to an uncontrolled unpleasant experience could has a life-time malicious effect of them. As a result, putting this sort of actions into practice is of vital importance, if and only if it be held under a fitting controlling measures.
- All too often companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees such consultants would be unnecessary
- The growth of online shopping will one day lead to all shops in towns and cities closing.Do you agree or disagree?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 89
- The system used for rubbish/garbage collection in your local area is not working properly. This is causing problems for you and your neighbours. Write a letter to the local council:-describe how rubbish collection system is not working properly.- explain 61
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes (for examples working for a charity, improving the neighbourhood or teaching sports to younger children).To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
- Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of society. others, however, believe that school is the place to learn this. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 354, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'have'
Suggestion: have
...ncontrolled unpleasant experience could has a life-time malicious effect of them. A...
^^^
Line 4, column 494, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'is'?
Suggestion: is
... of vital importance, if and only if it be held under a fitting controlling measur...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, so, then, sort of, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 24.0651302605 199% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2103.0 1615.20841683 130% => OK
No of words: 407.0 315.596192385 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16707616708 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49157444576 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06303766079 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 244.0 176.041082164 139% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.599508599509 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 658.8 506.74238477 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.4675249611 49.4020404114 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.705882353 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9411764706 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.05882352941 7.06120827912 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0896844407008 0.244688304435 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0300344114957 0.084324248473 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0354327982211 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0609433844918 0.151304729494 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0418004154506 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 78.4519038076 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.