Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes (for example working for a charity, improving the neighbourhood or teaching sports to younger children).
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is sometimes argued that high school students should be forced to take part in voluntary activities as a part of their learning process. However, I disagree with this notion due to its adverse bearing on many aspects.
On the one hand, there are many compelling reasons why becoming volunteers is an essential part of adolescence. Firstly, involving in unpaid community activities is a great chance for the learners to pay back for their community. This is because many our welfare is provided free these days by the government, especially study’s fee, hence, they obviously need to contribute back to the society. Secondly, compulsory community service provides numerous opportunities for them to cultivate their life skills. For instance, enrolling in a charity work to help children with special needs can help high school students how to deal with the difficult situations more effectively and develop their communication ability.
Nevertheless, forcing these students to attend in free service for the society may take a toll on various fields. The main reason is that the adolescence needs to concentrate on their core subjects to meet the deadline on time. Consequently, their academic will be deteriorated, especially for ones who have bad time-management skill. Furthermore, not all high school learners have a tendency to enjoy working for the society if their head teacher add this not as an optional part. They just want to complete their tasks as soon as possible and do not focus on their works, leading to many serious consequences.
In conclusion, while some maintain that high school learners must enroll in voluntary tasks, I firmly believe that they should not be forced to do free works for the community.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-06 | phannhi1511@ | 56 | view |
| 2024-11-06 | Nhi3132006 | 56 | view |
| 2024-11-06 | thuyan187 | 56 | view |
| 2024-11-06 | ankhanhvien | 56 | view |
| 2024-11-06 | trangiangtie | 73 | view |
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make Is this a positive or negative development 84
- Both governments and individuals are spending vast amounts of money protecting animals and their habitat This money could be better spent dealing with fundamental issues in society such as poverty and health care To what extent do you agree 78
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes for example working for a charity improving the neighbourhood or teaching sports to younger children To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Advances in science technology and other areas of society in the last 100 years have transformed the way we live as well as postponing the day we die There is no better time to be alive than now To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 84
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 178, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ced to do free works for the community.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, while, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1460.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21428571429 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90551902701 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 446.4 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.1069631032 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.307692308 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5384615385 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 7.06120827912 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260622690739 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.091039612296 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0709705837234 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17177224868 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0445484180422 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.