Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes (for example working for a charity, improving the neighbourhood or teaching sports to younger children).
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It has been suggested that high schools should make unpaid community service a compulsory programme. Some schools and colleges has already been providing those programmes for students to provide a platform and gain work experiences. Indeed, it is a good idea to include community services as part of the curriculum.
Students would be able to see the world in a different perspective. Most students born with privilege would not know what the world is like outside of their society. By providing community service, students would get a glimpse of how fortunate they are compared to others, making them learn how to give others. Community services are compulsory in international schools in Thailand. Students would have to take the program at least twice a year to be able to pass. There are wide ranges of activities for students to choose from – playing with orphans, fund raising for charities, and more. Thus, they would be able to meet more people, realising how fortunate they are.
With the influence of new technologies, community service provides more activities for students to do. Instead of watching television, playing computer games, or using IPads after class, community service could encourage students to enjoy activities outdoor. This could promote a healthy and active lifestyle instead of doing nothing that is useful for the society. Students would get to do physical works, encouraging them to stay active which students will become healthier.
Schools could treat community service as a way to help their students build foundations and gain work experiences. In addition, skills gained by compulsory work could be benefits for their CV; thus, increase their employability. Students would learn to cherish the skills they earned from it. Moreover, some skills acquired could be beneficial for their jobs in the future. For instance, fund raising may require students to think critically, plan, manage, or even manage their finances.
In conclusion, setting community service as a compulsory programme for high school could be beneficial for students in many ways. Students would be able to see the world in a different perspective and treat people better. Also, it would introduce students to an active lifestyle. Lastly, skills earned could be an asset for their own CV and future jobs.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-24 | shayma | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-19 | mikeboss268 | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-16 | Sohaib270 | 84 | view |
| 2019-12-04 | Chandrakumar Chanthujan | 78 | view |
| 2019-11-26 | Mihir Rami | 78 | view |
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school.Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages? 61
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes (for example working for a charity, improving the neighbourhood or teaching sports to younger children).To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010. 73
- The pie chart shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during 1990s. 73
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, lastly, may, moreover, so, thus, at least, for instance, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 7.85571142285 242% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1956.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 370.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28648648649 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38581623665 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73963415898 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.510810810811 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 586.8 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 16.0721442886 143% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.0844926373 49.4020404114 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 85.0434782609 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0869565217 20.7667163134 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.04347826087 7.06120827912 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 8.67935871743 196% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2376719564 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0876062212344 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0750931475559 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165984644224 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0659610834969 0.056905535591 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.