Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes (for example working for charity, improving the neighbourhood or teaching sports to younger children).
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
High school students tend to be directed to have a better performance in academic rather than in social life. While some people agree that unpaid community service should be included in a school syllabus, others argue that those kinds of activities bring more harm than good for the students. However, as far I am concerned, I do believe that children in such age need a place where they can enhance their aptitudes in socialising.
It is generally believed that children in these days lack social awareness. For this reason, most people suggest that students in high school should participate in some community activities such as working in charity programme. David Burghman, a senior psychologist in Singapore, believes that such activities are indeed needed by these children since it can help shape their personalities. They will turn out to be more self-reliance and they also will give more appreciation towards others. Therefore, including those types of activities in a school compulsory programme is a must.
On the other hand, some opponents claim that students should narrowly focus on their academic performances instead. These people emphasize that growing students’ interests in social life is not school’s duty. Neil Pattrick, an Australian teacher, insists that school is a place where students learn about something relating to knowledge and academic subjects. Sending them to participate in social activities will give them nothing but distraction which obviously interrupting their academic performance. By this explanation, unpaid community service is not suggested to be apart of schools programme.
In conclusion, although working in a charity or other social events can train high school students to be more independent, such activities are forecast to distract their performances in academic fields. However, I still believe that these activities are what students need for living in a real world, hence school representatives should find the right time when students can participate in that programme in order to not interrupt the learning process.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-26 | Hihello123 | 56 | view |
| 2018-08-08 | Muhammad Habibur Rohman | 73 | view |
| 2015-02-02 | ericachampan | 62 | view |
| 2014-09-14 | uday.narang | 80 | view |
| 2014-04-03 | bwosti | 75 | view |
- The chart below shows the percentage change in the share of international students among university graduates in different Canadian provinces between 2001 and 2006. 80
- The graph below shows information about the recruitment of teachers in Ontario between 2001 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 76
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes (for example working for charity, improving the neighbourhood or teaching sports to younger children).To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 569, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'suggested being'.
Suggestion: suggested being
...nation, unpaid community service is not suggested to be apart of schools programme. In concl...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 585, Rule ID: APART_A_PART[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'a part of' or 'apart from'?
Suggestion: a part of; apart from
...ommunity service is not suggested to be apart of schools programme. In conclusion, al...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, so, still, therefore, while, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1771.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 322.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.5 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99277224306 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537267080745 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 543.6 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.7157400562 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.066666667 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4666666667 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.73333333333 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244013220138 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0898340720248 0.084324248473 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0714542591584 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168770346241 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0523195420526 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.