Some people believe zoos are good places for people to learn about animals. Other people believe animals belong in nature and it is wrong to keep them in zoos. What do you think? Explain, giving specific reasons for your choice.
These days, zoos are becoming a great place for children and adults to visit spectacular animals like lions or tigers. But there have been an argument among many people: are zoos good for both the visiter and the animal or not? In my opinion, zoos might have some downsides but they benefits will be outweigh.
Around the world nowadays, many species are listed in the Red List due to the small number of it kinds, which are caused by the decline of it habitats or by hunters: cheetahs and elephants are endangered animals because many jungles have been burned down for farming or building purpose. So zoos can be a very great place to preserve endangerous species since animals will be protected from other harms. For instance, zoos give elephants chances to easily increasing it number thank to the protection to keep them from predators and foods are being provided everydays. Besides, zoos also give scientists the chance to study animal's behavior, which is a great source of information for the governments to make different change in law, so not the endangerous animals are being protected by rules, but also their living habitat can be preserved from being destroyed.
But on the other hand, zoos do bring diadvantages to the animal. According the environmental aspect, zoos are artificial so animals lose their instinct for hunting, which means if the government release those animals bach to their natunal habitat, it will be a matter of time before the animals die from starvation or perdators. For example, scientists in China had made an experience: they freed a tiger from the local zoos back to the jungle and attached a camera with it. Many week later, the record showed that the tiger had died from starvation -it couldn't hunted for preys since it hunting skills had been forgotten. Moreovers, based on the moral point of view, keeping animals in cages is unethical and agained their right.
To sum up, although zoos are entertaining and educational for children, they will change the animals' instinct which seems not to be rational. It would be better to protect the preserved areas to keep animals safe.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-02-11 | hamedbr | 61 | view |
| 2021-01-20 | docotrieu86@gmail.com | 56 | view |
| 2020-10-24 | nguyenngocnga7916 | 67 | view |
| 2020-10-06 | MinhDuy619 | 73 | view |
| 2020-10-06 | MinhDuy619 | 73 | view |
- is video games detrimental to children or develops children s intellectural 84
- These days some schools do not have enough money to pay for all the programs that they think are necessary for their students As a result some schools are considering allowing advertisements in their buildings Do you think this is a good idea Why or why n 78
- Some people think that employers should not care about the way their employees dress because what matters is the quality of their work To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Nowadays there are parents who believe that video games make bad affect to their children and who think that video games can make great impact in children s behavior 73
- Some people believe zoos are good places for people to learn about animals Other people believe animals belong in nature and it is wrong to keep them in zoos What do you think Explain giving specific reasons for your choice 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 285, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'benefit'
Suggestion: benefit
...zoos might have some downsides but they benefits will be outweigh. Around the world no...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 609, Rule ID: CHANCE_CHANGE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'change'?
Suggestion: change
... Besides, zoos also give scientists the chance to study animals behavior, which is a g...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 555, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
... the tiger had died from starvation -it couldnt hunted for preys since it hunting skill...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, if, moreover, so, as to, for example, for instance, in my opinion, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 13.1623246493 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1768.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 359.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92479108635 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35284910392 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53201657207 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548746518106 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 547.2 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 74.0864428921 49.4020404114 150% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.285714286 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6428571429 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.21428571429 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245116905265 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103691341148 0.084324248473 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0397885841519 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169651343551 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0247313904886 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 50.2224549098 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.