Some people believes that eventually all jobs will be done by artificially intelligent robots. Discuss both views and give your own opinion?
Nowadays, smart robots are progressively being substituted human workforce in various fields. While some people have a conviction that artificially intelligent robots can be overtaken all manual (blue-collar) occupations, it is unlikely that jobs which requires emotions can be carried out by machines. I will elaborate in this essay why only particular jobs will be replaceable with people.
First and foremost, careers which are conducting by hands can be easily done by machines without rely on human forces. Many companies will inevitably tend to utilize accurately programmed robots so that they can enhance the productivity by minimizing or even eradicating human errors. For instance, workers in production line usually do some boring routine tasks which may leads to a familiar and mistakes. Machines can easily do these jobs more effectively and precisely. Moreover, production of some of these manufactures might jeopardize human health due to working with chemical materials for example. Therefore, in such cases, robots would be far better option.
Another vital fact which should be take into consideration is that there are some emotional careers that human presence is an integrated part of them. Undoubtedly, when it comes to the people interactions, behavior, knowledge and experience play prominent roles in the jobs. I remember when I faced an issue in my marriage, I went to a therapy and shared my concerns. If I could not have consult with my psychologist, I would have never known my depression disorders. Furthermore, although knowledge can be transferred by program, it would be impossible to take into account all the human conduction variations since it is totally unpredictable. You cannot determine the feeling of the people regarding specific behavior and that is the hardest part of the automation.
Based on the points mentioned above replacement of human staff will be happen for a considerable number of jobs in future. Robots will be dominant in blue-collar jobs; however, some other sophisticated jobs will continue to be under humans’ control. Ultimately, very few jobs will be safe in an increasingly artificially intelligent labor.
- TPO 7 integrated: receiving the eco-certification in wood companies of United States 85
- You have long been friends with someone If they do something that you don t like should you still be friends with him or her 60
- is wining the most important aspect of playing a game? 73
- Should a city preserve or destroy its historic building? 76
- A/D: If people have the opportunity to get a secure job, they should take it right away rather than wait for a job that would be more satisfying. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 36, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'taken'?
Suggestion: taken
.... Another vital fact which should be take into consideration is that there are so...
^^^^
Line 4, column 389, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'consulted'.
Suggestion: consulted
...shared my concerns. If I could not have consult with my psychologist, I would have neve...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 113, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...appen for a considerable number of jobs in future. Robots will be dominant in blue-collar...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 7.85571142285 267% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1841.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 339.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43067846608 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09963954912 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604719764012 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 594.9 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.7865045034 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.277777778 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8333333333 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88888888889 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260784767538 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0824700404603 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0690775478645 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180117945096 0.151304729494 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.08778862421 0.056905535591 154% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.98 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 78.4519038076 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.