some people feel that the design of newly constructed buildings in big cities should be controlled by governments others believe those who finance the construction of a building should be free to design it as they see fit discuss both these views and give

It is argued among citizens that freshly built establishments shall be observed by local authorities, whereas the rest tend to believe that those who sponsor the construction should adjust and design the way one desires. While the overall look of the city is important as our brains, the private investor must have the right to contribute to its investment the way one wants.
On the one side, having a harmonizing appearance for the city's status is crucial to altogether mood of people and recognition of its globally. One of the pivotal reason behind the popularity of megapolises such as Tokyo, New York, and London it's their well-harmonized and filled with unique features neighborhoods. If one is to decide to watch images on a widespread internet source, he or she will be able to recognize the similar pattern that those constructions own. Recent research has proved that distinct looks of city blocks tend to repel tourist fascination which results in a lack of the chief economical sector - tourism.
On the other hand, taking a part in the planning and designing of the building one has contributed to is a must. In other words, tremendous investors that make up the major section of the economy should be allowed to compose their purchase based on their aesthetic standarts. If not, the relationship with the authorities and one of the main sustainers of the economy might spoil. For example, Kruger, who considers to be a multi-billion conglomeration owner was constrained in applying the "Ancient Greek" design to his building, which was 100% financed by him, denied the collaborations and any work with the government.
In conclusion, although it is crucial to keep the image, it is counted as an infringement of human rights to go against the major contributors to nations well being.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 242, Rule ID: IT_IS[17]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...ses such as Tokyo, New York, and London its their well-harmonized and filled with u...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, so, well, whereas, while, as to, for example, in conclusion, such as, in other words, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1513.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0602006689 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05986746263 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615384615385 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 466.2 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 40.1702986367 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.545454545 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1818181818 20.7667163134 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7272727273 7.06120827912 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196397798884 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0648467137426 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.065361802122 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0992864078576 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.067154224622 0.056905535591 118% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.89 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.