Some people feel that it is always wrong to keep animal s in captivity, for instance in zoos. Other people say that there are benefits for the animals and for humans. Discuss both sides of this debate, and give your personal view.
Animate being is an inseparable component of the universe and there is a controversial matter concerning animals. Some people consider that it is purely incorrect that certain creature’s freedom is confined in zoos. However, others believe that it is useful for both animals and humanity. The followings will be based on investigations upon both aspects.
On the one hand, some might argue that incarcerating animals in zoological gardens could be cruelty, since these creatures are portion of the existence like human being. Humanity has no rights using them for exhibitions which generate hardship in their lifespan in which they deprives of their habitations they get accustomed. Furthermore, some animals might suffer from being harsh attitude which in results to cause the death from mentally distress. In fact, it is a well-known fact that in order to tame the fresh animals they torture by a variety of brutal methods like beating them with rope so as to perform diverse actions. The result of mentally distress some animals’ life could gave away.
On the other hand, maintaining animals in zoos could have a number of benefits for both animate being and human being. One advantageous side for animals that they are well-fed and kept in adequate temperature in zoological garden. In particular, animals do not have to care about sustenance by seeking it in certain harsh areas or weather. Moreover, one obvious opportunity for the passionate of fauna is emerged in zoos. For example, not everyone capable to travel across the world in order to observe creature’s habitats and zoos generate their dream come true.
Having inspected both aspects, it appears to me that it could have some benefits of holding animals in zoos, however it should be highlighted that zookeepers should not treat with animals barbarously.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2018-07-13 | DSpatel171 | 84 | view |
2018-08-09 | ajmeet | 84 | view |
- Today, it is vitally weighty for developing advances in health, education and commerce countries and the affluent countries should engage more responsibility in helping to the poor nations in such areas. 78
- Millions of people every year move to English-speaking countries such asAustralia, Britain or America, in order to study at school, college or university.Why do so many people want to study in English?Why is English such an important international languag 73
- Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations by providing such things as food and education? Or is it the responsibility of the governments of poorer nations to look after their citizens themselves? 78
- Some universities now offer their courses on the Internet so that people can study online Is this a positive or negative development 83
- Without capital punishment (the death penalty) our lives are less secure and crimes of violence increase. Capital punishment is essential to control violence in society.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 276, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'deprive'
Suggestion: deprive
...ardship in their lifespan in which they deprives of their habitations they get accustome...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 597, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...tal methods like beating them with rope so as to perform diverse actions. The result of ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 693, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'give'
Suggestion: give
... distress some animals' life could gave away. On the other hand, maintaining a...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, well, as to, for example, in fact, in particular, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1547.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24406779661 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86067151903 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572881355932 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 494.1 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.7969289714 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.133333333 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.13333333333 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283128198658 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102665622065 0.084324248473 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.071498484107 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184450113888 0.151304729494 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0617088633739 0.056905535591 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.