Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations by providing such things as food and education? Or is it the responsibility of the governments of poorer nations to look after their citizens themselves?
Our world is a very diverse place, and not always in a good way. There is a huge disproportion in terms of wealth and resources across different countries, and this state of affairs raises the question whether richer nations should aid those less fortunate or rather let them fight their battle for themselves.
To begin with, each type of people is human being. It would be great as long as the wealthier states could assist to the poor states by providing with free education and food. For example, in Africa the total quantity of famine, deficiency of circumstances and education system has grown up.
Additionally, affluent countries should improve the welfare system in order to assist to less fortunate nations. For instance, the wealthiest person Bill Gate donates annually some fraction of his money for charity.
On the other hand, wealthy people earn that currency fairly and it is not their duty to provide the poor with resources. On the contrary, it is responsibility on government to deal with such internal problems. In particular, Officials could sacrifice by taxing affluent in order to provide the poor citizens with free education and food. As a result, the economy of country would be grown up dramatically.
Furthermore, the result of receiving easy resources, they might abuse the welfare system. In fact, in terms of inequality prices of education, the poor whom have free access to schools might ignore the responsibility of studying which leads to exceeding disorder in educational system and curriculum. Therefore, every nation should attempt to eliminate the poor quality by themselves.
Personally, I think that although wealthy nations should not be obliged to help the poorer ones, it seems like the right thing to do. Apart from humanitarian reasons, it can also bring about some political and economic benefits to the donors as they are creating a foundation for future cooperation and potential trade.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-25 | ahmadrava88 | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-27 | Akten | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-27 | Akten | 61 | view |
| 2019-08-09 | Jazz 12344 | 56 | view |
| 2019-07-11 | Bholo | 73 | view |
- Television has changed the quality of life for the ordinary person Do you agree or disagree 55
- Millions of people every year move to English-speaking countries such asAustralia, Britain or America, in order to study at school, college or university.Why do so many people want to study in English?Why is English such an important international languag 73
- People today move to new cities or new countries more than ever before. What challenges do they experience? What strategies are there to meet challenges? 56
- Popular events like the football World Cup and other international sporting occasions are essential in easing international tensions and releasing patriotic emotions in a safe way.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 84
- In many countries children are engaged in some kind of paid work. Some people regard this as completely wrong, while others consider it as valuable work experience, important for learning and taking responsibility.What are your opinions on this? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 190, Rule ID: WHETHER[5]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "the question"?
Suggestion: whether
...tries, and this state of affairs raises the question whether richer nations should aid those less fo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, so, therefore, apart from, for example, for instance, i think, in fact, in particular, as a result, on the contrary, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1627.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16507936508 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80074855919 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609523809524 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 503.1 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.7166257117 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.6875 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6875 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.75 7.06120827912 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238010272585 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0641058494755 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0670484223402 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100854994941 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0503859322908 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.