Some people feel that paparazzi should not follow celebrities and invade their privacy by taking pictures of them everywhere while others believe this is just the price of fame Discuss both sides and give your opinion

Essay topics:

Some people feel that paparazzi should not follow celebrities and invade their privacy by taking pictures of them everywhere, while others believe this is just the price of fame. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.

These days, it is common for journalists and photographers to follow celebrities around to capture their private moments. Most of the time, these people are trying to shoot famous people in embarrassing or compromising situations. These photos are then sold to media houses for a huge sum and within seconds they get plastered all over the media both online and offline. In my opinion, this practice cannot be permitted. Celebrities have a private life just like everyone else and it is important for the media and the general public to respect it.

Just because someone is famous, it does not mean that they should live every moment of their life in full public glare. Celebrities have their own private life. They have moments where they want to shut the world out. If photographers follow them round the clock, it can hurt their emotional health. It is tiring to try to behave perfectly all the time. Nobody can accomplish that feat. Celebrities are no exceptions. They have their moments of weakness and those are not to be celebrated on the internet or television channels at their expense.

Of course, there are people who believe that the invasion of privacy is the price of stardom. I do not quite agree with this view. It is true that common folks have a lot of interest in the private lives of famous people. Very often, this need stems from their feelings of insecurity and inadequacy. For example, the general public has so much interest in learning about the unflattering side of celebrities. Knowing that famous people also have shortcomings makes them feel good about themselves. However, media persons are not supposed to stalk the rich and famous with the sole objective of digging out juicy personal details. Such details might entertain their readers or viewers, but they do a great deal of damage to the person of their attention. Princess Diana, for example, was killed in a car crash while trying to flee paparazzi. She was with her boyfriend and probably did not want cameramen to capture them together. Unfortunately, the relentless paparazzi chased them leading to the crash that killed the eminent woman whom the world admired. One can never justify such incidents with the lame excuse that it is the price of stardom.

In conclusion, like everyone else, celebrities are also entitled to their privacy and any violation of it must not be permitted.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-06-04 Camron 56 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 520, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...d it is important for the media and the general public to respect it. Just because someone ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 318, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...curity and inadequacy. For example, the general public has so much interest in learning about ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, second, so, then, while, for example, in conclusion, of course, in my opinion, it is true

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 24.0651302605 199% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1982.0 1615.20841683 123% => OK
No of words: 402.0 315.596192385 127% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93034825871 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47771567384 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60215176005 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 176.041082164 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547263681592 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 623.7 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 5.43587174349 258% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 16.0721442886 162% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.9494054466 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.2307692308 106.682146367 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4615384615 20.7667163134 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.34615384615 7.06120827912 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220478737358 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0561648335712 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0400353447816 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120910703639 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0270679053773 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 13.0946893788 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.