Some people hold that we should spend money and time on the protection of wild animals while others suggest that the money should be spent on populations living in the poorest areas of the world. What is your opinion?
In these years, animal protection has become a subject of ongoing scientific research and an issue of concern. People lake different views toward the enormous spending required by wildlife conservation. It is suggested that the spending should be diverted to helping human populations, especially those living below poverty line, because human life is more valuable than animal life. In my opinion, the investment in animal conservation is worthwhile.
Animals, as a significant part of an ecosystem, have profound impacts on the sustainability of an ecosystem and on the well-being of humanity. All animals are connected in one way or another in food chains. For this reason, the demise of a species and then put this species at the verge of extinction. The natural balance will be disrupted and the ecosystem cannot be sustained. It would disable vegetation from purifying water, recycling nutrient and pollinating crops. We humans are eventually affected.
Another justification for animal protection is that animals play a significant role in the development of industries, as an important natural resource. People derive substances and materials from animals provide essential substances for drug-making. It is also very common that designers and engineers turn to wildlife for inspiration. For instance the invention of water-proof clothing drew upon the research on sharks.
On account of those benefits, wildlife protection is a significant: strategy that has far-reaching effects on the future of human. However, when implemented, this strategy should be adapted in different contexts. It should be noted that spending money simply on animals is not the approach that promises the best outcomes in all circumstances. For example, in those regions where inhabitants struggle with weak economies and have few job sources, direct spending on any animal program would not stop people from hunting and trading animals for a living. An alternative strategy is creating jobs or providing subsidies, lifting these regions out of poverty.
From what has been discussed, animals are key components of the whole natural order and have relevance to the sustainability of an ecosystem and the interests of humanity. Animal protection is strategy that applies to the whole world, and might vary in different circumstances.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-08 | thanhtu000 | 78 | view |
| 2023-04-12 | thanhtu000 | 61 | view |
| 2023-01-21 | thanhtu000 | 84 | view |
- Some people believe that technology has led to many positive developments in their lives while others think technology is gradually taking over control of the way people live Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 58
- Some people believe that air travel should be restricted because it causes serious pollution and will use up the world’s resources. Do you agree and disagree? 84
- It is not uncommon that children are required to obey the rule of their parents and teachers. Some people are worried that too much control over children will not prepare them well for their adult life. Discuss both sides and give your opinion. 84
- It is said that the fast pace of our everyday life, as a direct result of the rapid development of telecommunications technology and travel industry, has negative effects on individuals, nation and the globe. To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Today, more school leavers are unable to find jobs. Discuss the causes of rising unemployment among young adults and suggest any solutions. 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... in animal conservation is worthwhile. Animals, as a significant part of an eco...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ps. We humans are eventually affected. Another justification for animal protect...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hing drew upon the research on sharks. On account of those benefits, wildlife p...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... lifting these regions out of poverty. From what has been discussed, animals ar...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, then, well, while, for example, for instance, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1967.0 1615.20841683 122% => OK
No of words: 357.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.50980392157 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34677393335 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07293765081 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554621848739 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 622.8 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.5653461977 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.6666666667 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.90476190476 7.06120827912 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209032501405 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0572584713052 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0525827365023 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112046877279 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0536838876399 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.38 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.