To provide help to those, who are in need of it is, indeed a virtuous act. There are mainly two means of providing help. The first one is to provide direct help to those who are around you, while the second one involves donation through charitable organisations.
Firstly, direct help has many advantages. We an provide help directly to the person in need and we can also have a look on how the money I being used. As there is no involvement of middlemen in this, the money is safe in the hands of the person whom we have given to. Moreover, helping in a local community makes the people respect you and you would be an inspiration for the kids in your community.
Secondly, donation through national and international organisations is also very advantageous because it offers help on a global basis and provided to address global issues. The charitable activities spread through a large network. But the only disadvantage with charitable organisations is that, some organisations does not offer the complete amount given to them and keep it in their pockets. However, help may not always be in the form of money. It can also be in the form of any service you can offer. For example, if you are a doctor, you can provide free health check up in the needy areas. Likewise, if you are a teacher, you can voluntarily teach in the remote area of a village.
The kind of help you offer may also depend on the economic status of that particular country. For instance, in a developed country, where the poorest of the poor are amenable to basic necessities of life, you can offer your help through national or international organisations. If you want to offer help to developing or underdeveloped nation and if you are in a position to help, you can donate with your own hands.
To conclude, offering help directly or through national or international charitable organisations is good, but direct help has advantages over charitable organisation, where there might be a risk of fraud.
- some people think that art is a essential subject for children at school, while some think it is a waste of time, discuss both views and give your opinion 56
- The diagram shows how fruit is canned Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The bar chart shows the divorce rates in two European countries from 2011 to 2015.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The Smith Corporation should not be permitted to develop the land that is now part of the Youngtown Wildlife Preserve. This sanctuary is essential to the survival of the 300 bird species that live in our area.Although only a small percentage of the land w 82
- Currently there is a trend towards the use of alternative forms of medicine. However, at best these methods are ineffective, and at worst they may be dangerous. To what extent do you agree with this statement? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 46, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...ly, direct help has many advantages. We an provide help directly to the person in ...
^^
Line 3, column 46, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ly, direct help has many advantages. We an provide help directly to the person in need and...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 138, Rule ID: I_AM[1]
Message: Did you mean 'I am'?
Suggestion: I am
...e can also have a look on how the money I being used. As there is no involvement ...
^
Line 7, column 179, Rule ID: BASIC_FUNDAMENTALS[1]
Message: Use simply 'necessities'.
Suggestion: necessities
...the poorest of the poor are amenable to basic necessities of life, you can offer your help throug...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, likewise, look, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, while, for example, for instance, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1645.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 345.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76811594203 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88589119509 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.498550724638 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 537.3 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.1968833701 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.3888888889 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1666666667 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.44444444444 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179620765125 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0683139244315 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0435153082011 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123810931201 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0378067598935 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.0946893788 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 12.4159519038 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.