Today, the world is becoming more and more closely linked. Trade has increased and the movement of people between countries is greater than ever before. However, billions of people still live in poverty and in many places, the gap between rich and poor is widening. This essay will look at the arguments in favour of and against helping poor countries.
There are many reasons to help poor nations. First of all, there are humanitarian reasons and individuals who give charity fall under this reason. Many countries believe that it is their religious, social or moral duty to help people who is suffering from famine, drought, war or disease. Apart from this, some rich countries donate money due to political or diplomatic reasons. They maintain the relation of dependency with recipient or simply influence government or directions of that country. Moreover, many nations help poor ones for economic reasons. They try to control the supply of comodities such as oil, water or wheat. Alternatively, richer countries want to ensure markets for their own products, whether these are planes, computers or shoes.
On the other hand, aid is not necessarily the best way to help poor nations. The main reason is that billions of dollers of aid goes missing, in corrupt government or inefficient administration. In addition to this, various foreign aid projects are unsuitable for the target country. Many agencies build huge dams or set up industrial projects which fail after few years or do not involve local people. Furthermore, much aid returns to donors. This can be in the form of expensive specialised equipments or experts from the donor country.
There are many other ways to help poor countries. Opening up the trade barriers, so that poor nations can sell their products or goods, is one way. Another one is to remove subsidies. This will allow them to compete fairly in foreign markets. Forgive debts is the third one as many countries have huge interest repayments on old loans.
To conclude, the need of poor countries may seem obvious. However, although our humanity makes us want to help these nations to eliminate poverty and sufferings, we must examine actual needs of people in such nations and implement appropriate solutions that will help both donor and recipient nations.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 196, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...vernment or inefficient administration. In addition to this, various foreign aid...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, look, may, moreover, so, still, third, apart from, in addition, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 10.4138276553 202% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1925.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 377.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10610079576 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4064143971 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62030033943 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572944297082 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 581.4 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 16.0721442886 156% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.9581505789 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.0 106.682146367 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.08 20.7667163134 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.32 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.106329300061 0.244688304435 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0296145112157 0.084324248473 35% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0317725632774 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0598212336643 0.151304729494 40% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.032281142797 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.0946893788 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 50.2224549098 129% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.3001002004 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.77 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.