Some people say that in all levels of education, from primary school to universities, too much time spent on learning facts and not enough on learning practical skills.
Do you agree or disagree?
It is true that the most of schools and higher degree institutes dedicate their time to learn about basic science in any fields, however, to some extent I believe that it should better set up modern and reliable techniques for pupils coincide with their indoor classes.
Nowadays, the majority of parents argue that the conventional guidelines of teaching have an awful influence on their children’s life. They come up by demonstrating several reasons. Firstly, one of the biggest concerns of them is a lack of the trained recruits in markets. They believe that schools are obliged to improve talent of students in a period of learning and prepare them to enter market and universities must grant wisdom of managing and handling of life after being educated. Secondly, they indicate that regarding soaring of cost of living, to meet needs and tackle economic issues, merely educated person does not work at all.
On the other hand, universities and schools show that all developed nations profit from educated students who devote all of their time based on learning and teaching rules of their countries. They point out each country need Doctors, Engineers and physical worker and labors. In my idea, the law of education needs some refinement and the conventional cannot address and accommodate the futures demand of new arrival students to markets and industries. Facts and figures prove that and educated and skilled individual could more efficient than a double of 10 people in any majors and fields such as science, sports, engineering, special professions and even on monotonous jobs.
In conclusion, to reach a compromise in education systems between people and governments¸ it should better authorities improve the old-fashioned structures of teaching and learning and convert the rules to practical courses at the same time with facts.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-12-14 | sherin rijo | 67 | view |
| 2016-11-28 | MOKO | 78 | view |
- Nowadays most of the urgent problems can only be solved through international cooperation. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 73
- Some people say that in all levels of education, from primary school to universities, too much time spent on learning facts and not enough on learning practical skills.Do you agree or disagree? 78
- Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities. Others, however, say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required.Discuss both these views and give yo 84
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school.Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages? 73
- Some say that only people born with certain talents should practice arts such as music painting and poetry Others however think that anyone can participate in these activities Discuss both views and give your own opinion 62
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 21, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the schools') or simply say ''most schools''.
Suggestion: most of the schools; most schools
It is true that the most of schools and higher degree institutes dedicate t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 646, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y educated person does not work at all. On the other hand, universities and scho...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 679, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rofessions and even on monotonous jobs. In conclusion, to reach a compromise in ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, in conclusion, such as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 10.4138276553 202% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1559.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24915824916 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78121000078 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622895622896 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 474.3 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.1178177265 49.4020404114 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.727272727 106.682146367 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 20.7667163134 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4545454545 7.06120827912 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152706148924 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0467292902602 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0508118288019 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0923046318078 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0279584499072 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.6 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.