People have different views regarding whether communication on mobile phones should be banned in public places or not. Although a section of society believes that it must be completely banned in crowded places due to the chances of robbery, I harbour the belief that to maintain the right of freedom, mobile phone users must not be banned publically. This essay will discuss both viewpoints including my recommendations in the subsequent paragraphs.
To begin, masses have a strong consensus that talking on mobile phones must be restricted at overly crowded places because it enhances the probability of robbing or snatching the cellphones. Since places such as busy markets or railway stations always attract petty thieves, they do not spare any chance of stealing the mobiles from users while they are communicating with it. Consequently, victims left with no options but to repent lately for utilizing cell phones at crowded places. Therefore, they emphasize restrictions to held to avoid any unwanted troubles or robberies. In Bangalore, for instance, the state government has completely banned the usage of talking on mobile equipment at railway stations due to an increase in the rate of thefts in the state. Hence, proponents encourage and appreciate these laws to be enforced at all the crowded places.
On the contrary, I advocate with the view that countries ought to provide the right of freedom to have conversation wherever they like. While nowadays, people are significantly busy with their schedules that they often attend work or private calls during travelling or at public places to run their businesses or lifestyles smoothly. So, if restrictions will impose at those places, workers or employees may get impacted at a large extent, and it may hamper their communication with their teammates or progress to accomplish their goals. Additionally, restrictions on a conversation over mobile phones violate the right to freedom act of any country’s constitution. To avoid any chaos among denizens to impose these laws, it would be appropriate to have the freedom to talk at any places.
In conclusion, despite people have opinions in connection with implementing restrictions on usage of mobile phones at crowded places, I firmly state that every individual should have the right to talk freely to avoid any circumstances whether professionally or personally.
- Recent advances in air travel have focused only on those sitting in upper class and have left other passengers with no benefits To what extent do you agree or disagree 76
- Write a letter complaining about the dirty roads and garbage in your street Why it is effect and problem What is the main causes Your suggestions 89
- Some people believe that universities should only offer places to students with high marks while other believes that people of all ages should be allowed even they don t do well in school Discuss both views and give your opinion 95
- Smart devices have put all of the world s information at our fingertips What are the drawbacks of this development 89
- Adults do less exercise nowadays Some think that people can be encouraged to live healthy lives through sporting events such as the Olympics or the World Cup Others think that there are better ways to encourage adults for exercise Discuss both views an 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, hence, if, may, regarding, so, therefore, while, for instance, in conclusion, sort of, such as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 70.0 41.998997996 167% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2043.0 1615.20841683 126% => OK
No of words: 384.0 315.596192385 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3203125 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4267276788 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00717886544 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5234375 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 639.0 506.74238477 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.7408925634 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.2 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239282708965 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0891911914374 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0661501582159 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16530459709 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0784406898414 0.056905535591 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.52 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.