It goes without saying that money plays a vital role in our life and managing money is an important skill of life. However, learning this skill is also important. An argument has been put forward that this statement is a debatable issue. According to my opinion this question statement has both positive and negative aspects.
There are a plethora of reasons why managing money is necessary for life. First point which comes to my mind is that it is good for children future, since they learn this in teenager age and they will be able to manage their wealth and property. Secondly,they can understand the value of money and they will try to reduce their unuseable expenses. Third, they also learn how to budget their money as such as state. What is more, they can also develop maturity and tolerance. And it can also motivate them to plan funds for their future. And it also reduces the financial burden on there parents.
On the other hand, managing money at high school has also some drawbacks. It would be foolish to ignore that mostly students are immatured in the school life. However, they can not understand the managing money. They can not grasp it. And if we add one more subject in their school the burden of study will increase surely. They can not take high burden of study. Furthermore, if they will try to do this subject well they will definitely lose marks in other subjects and if they lose their marks it will surely effect on their result or percentage.
In conclusion, I firmly believe that it is a good thing to learn about managing money but if this subject compulsory in school it will effect on students. I think, their more disadvantages than advantages.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 255, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , they
...nage their wealth and property. Secondly,they can understand the value of money and t...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 513, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[7]
Message: Did you mean 'affect'?
Suggestion: affect
...if they lose their marks it will surely effect on their result or percentage. In co...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 136, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[6]
Message: Did you mean 'affect'?
Suggestion: affect
...is subject compulsory in school it will effect on students. I think, their more disadv...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, third, well, i think, in conclusion, such as, what is more, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 24.0651302605 195% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1394.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.70945945946 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42561921187 2.80592935109 86% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.516891891892 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 432.9 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.2929072068 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 69.7 106.682146367 65% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.8 20.7667163134 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.15 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183294238404 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0645585064505 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0664356133479 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129895057121 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0664933250284 0.056905535591 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.2 13.0946893788 63% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 50.2224549098 131% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.3001002004 67% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.45 12.4159519038 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.32 8.58950901804 85% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 78.4519038076 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.