It is sometimes argue that the public health can be improved by providing more sports facilities in the communities. While more sports facilities can be convenient for people to do various physical activities, governments need to pay more efforts on introducing the senses of public health among the public as many people are lack of awareness on their health.
On the one hand, by allocating more resources on building sports centers and gymnasiums in the society, more people can enjoy different types of sports and attending the physical training class like yoga class and swimming class etc. The free sports facilities are necessary for every member in society to have the opportunities to enhance their physical condition. In addition, by providing a variety of training courses to public, people can have more chances to enjoy the activities that require team members such as footballs and basketballs.
On the other hand, apart from promoting the physical activities by contrasting sports facilities, it is more important to spread the concepts of healthy living style to the general public. Firstly, many people in the city accustom the busy living style, they just focus on their careers and academic results and physically inactive. For this situation, encouraging them to do more exercises is more important than building sports facilities. Secondly, the hygiene is an essential factor of the healthy community, government should make a notice on this aspect and pay great efforts on maintaining the clean environment to prevent the spread of diseases and reduce the pollution in city.
In conclusion, it may be easier for users to participate in various sports if more sports facilities are provided to public, but in the long term this would be better for people and governments to nurture the senses of healthy living style.
- The charts below show reasons for travel and the main issues for the travelling public in the US in 2009. 89
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000.Summarize he information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- the table below gives information about consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002 61
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 17, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'argued'.
Suggestion: argued
It is sometimes argue that the public health can be improved ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 174, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...concepts of healthy living style to the general public. Firstly, many people in the city accus...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, while, apart from, in addition, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1553.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22895622896 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78776899213 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.511784511785 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 482.4 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.4598894395 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 155.3 106.682146367 146% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.7 20.7667163134 143% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.5 7.06120827912 177% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180622946256 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0839983888911 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0536090663606 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123729782863 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0470387750557 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 13.0946893788 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 50.2224549098 84% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.65 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.