Some people say that with the considerable benefits computers and internet bring about, they can completely replace the traditional role of a teacher. Do you agree or disagree with it?
In today’s society, with considerable breakthroughs in the field of technology (particularly with the invention of computers and the internet), some people hold the assumption that the role of teachers in a child’s schooling has started to fade. However, I strongly believe that teachers are of paramount importance and so cannot be made redundant.
On the one hand, computers are considered to assist students in progressing more quickly than they would in an original classroom. For example, there are various types of students in the same class, meaning that those with better performance are tied to slow advances in their studies due to others’ incapability to comprehend the lectures. Learning using computers, on the contrary, enables these youngsters to progress at their own pace, allowing for faster and deeper acquisition of knowledge.
On the other hand, I am of the opinion that the appearance of a standard instructor is indispensable for several reasons. Firstly, motivation and discipline are critical factors for any students’ comprehensive development, which is beyond the scope of computers with a predetermined curriculum. Teachers, however, are those who can tell if their pupils are acting inappropriately and thus help to adjust their behaviors. Furthermore, as computers are emotionless compared to humans, they are unable to praise their students when they accomplish a challenging task or give encouragement to assist them to overcome learning obstacles when necessary. As a result, without the presence of a teacher, children lack the motivation to progress on their study itineraries.
Secondly, the process of education in a classroom should not be disregarded. Students and teachers' two-way communications allow young children to be exposed to actual society rather than virtual space, helping them to become more energetic and confident via group activities. On top of that, critical thinking or problem-solving are examples of abilities that only by being exposed to real-life is a child capable of assimilating, thereby allowing them to develop to their full potential.
By way of conclusion, I reaffirm my state that despite a bunch of technological advancements nowadays, it is evident that teachers will always be of necessity and thus should not be underestimated.
- The table below shows a survey on the preference of three age groups for different TV programs in a European country in 2012 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The table describes the percentage of employers difficulty in recruiting employees in fourdifferent fields from 2003 to 2004 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant 78
- Some people believe that school children should not be given homework by their teachers whereas others argue that homework plays an important role in the education of children Discuss both of these views and give your own opinion 84
- The table shows the number of employees and factories producing silk in England and Wales between 1851 and 1901 78
- Some people think that people who choose a job early and keep doing it are more likely to have a satisfying career life than those who frequently change jobs To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 350, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to use'.
Suggestion: to use
...ty to comprehend the lectures. Learning using computers, on the contrary, enables the...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, thus, for example, as a result, on the contrary, on the other hand, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1959.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 355.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51830985915 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27891921946 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597183098592 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 609.3 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.7707934682 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.928571429 106.682146367 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3571428571 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4285714286 7.06120827912 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152910215136 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0486419435741 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0739016987428 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0881324792506 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0889162713271 0.056905535591 156% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.26 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 78.4519038076 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.