Some people say that economic growth is the only way to end hunger and poverty, while others say that economic growth is
damaging the environment so it must be stopped. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
It is believed that the only way to write off hunger and poverty is growing economy, others thinks that the environment is compromised so putting a stop to economic growth is a must. Personally, I would argue with the second viewpoint.
On the one hand, there are several reasons why some people embrace economic growth. First, since economic growth increases, the wealth from profits will find its way into the pockets of the underprivileged. This is partly due to the fact that growing economy is a contributor to enhance the number of charity organizations, which is likely to give a monetary support to the poorer. In Vietnam, like for instance, the increase in the number of charity bodies results in alleviate hunger and poverty rate. Second, economic growth also act as a precursor to creating more jobs for the poor. In fact, needs for job seeking and economic growth have gone up simultaneously as growing economy has required a host of white-collars and blue-collars to support. As a result, chances are the poor has more opportunities to earn a living and break out of the vicious circle of poverty.
On the other hand, I believe that economic growth breeds significant amount of waste discharged into the environment. An explanation for this could be that the enterprises and companies are likely to mushroom as economic growth happens, which make the amount of toxic waste exponentially increase. Plenty of evidence has suggested that the enterprises and companies discharge a huge amount of chemical waste to environment. Furthermore, deforestation rate seems to markedly rise due to growth of economy. In fact, needs to produce cash crops for export can trigger serious environmental issues, especially global warming. Loss of trees results in imbalance of ecosystem and increase in average temperature of the Earth.
In conclusion, although economic growth has helped end hunger and poverty, I think followed shortcomings associated with it are more significant.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-04 | nguyenminhchau372 | 84 | view |
- Explain some of the ways in which humans are damaging the environment. Whatcan governments do to address these problems? What can individual people do? 61
- The table below shows the percentage of the population by age groups in one town who rode bicycles in 2011 81
- Do you agree or disagree with the statement that the government should invest more money in science education rather than other subjects to develop the country? 89
- Some people say that economic growth is the only way to end hunger and poverty, while others say that economic growth isdamaging the environment so it must be stopped. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 84
- The table below shows the percentage of the population by age groups in one town who rode bicycles in 2011. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
It is believed that the only way to writ...
^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...would argue with the second viewpoint. On the one hand, there are several reaso...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...out of the vicious circle of poverty. On the other hand, I believe that econom...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e in average temperature of the Earth. In conclusion, although economic growth ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, second, so, for instance, i think, in conclusion, in fact, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1662.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19375 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00738673935 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5625 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 533.7 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.2172674978 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.875 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.75 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282536777196 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0876677911237 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0844553117999 0.0667982634062 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183891676877 0.151304729494 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0461887278305 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.