Many people believe that economic development is the best measure to deal with the problems of hunger and poverty, whilst others claim that it should not be continuous because of its environmental damages. Although I agree with the second view, in this essay I will discuss both views and support my opinion with evidence and examples.
On the one hand, a growing number of people think that hunger and poverty could be only addressed by economic growth. It is their view that economic development brings increasing opportunities for work for all countries. This is the same meaning with a significant drop in the unemployment rate. As a result, workers would be likely to afford their essential needs with a constant income. Additionally, they claim that when countries concentrate on the development in the economy field, there would be a rise in gross domestic product. Consequently, a small amount of money would be used for reducing hunger in many parts of countries.
On the other hand, there is a common belief that economic growth should be halted because of devastating the environment. This is because they say that more and more factories and companies constructed is the major factor of environmental damage, which is due to the emission of carbon dioxide. Furthermore, there is also an argument that cutting down forest increasingly to make way for factories and economic purpose causes climate change and global environmental problems. Take recent years as a good example. Our planet has witnessed unpredictable climate conditions and many such disasters as drought, earthquake, tsunami and so on, which have killed million people in Japan, Indonesia and other places.
In conclusion, despite the clear benefits of economic growth for reducing hunger and poverty in countries, I believe that there are a variety of negative impacts on the environment which should be balanced before going on the development.
- There are more workers to work from home and more students to study from home. This is because the computer technology is more and more easily accessible and cheaper. Do you think it is a positive or negative development 56
- There are more workers to work from home and more students to study from home. This is because the computer technology is more and more easily accessible and cheaper. Do you think it is a positive or negative development 56
- Some people say that economic growth is the only way to end world poverty and hunger. Others say that economic growth is damaging the environment and should stop .Discuss bọth views and give your own opinion. 78
- the advantages and disadvantages of the learning English in Vietnam 82
- The bar chart shows the percentage of the total world population in four countries in 1950 and 2002 and projections for 2050 69
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 657, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...e, tsunami and so on, which have killed million people in Japan, Indonesia and other pl...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, furthermore, if, second, so, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1624.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23870967742 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89626405451 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574193548387 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 504.9 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.0619448184 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.0 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1428571429 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.71428571429 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242244410086 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0760043035797 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0755082469458 0.0667982634062 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146903565482 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0213727303642 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.