Some people say that economic growth is the only way to end world poverty and hunger. Others say that economic growth is damaging the environment and should stop. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
These days, it is claimed that in order to prevent global indigence and famine, people should have a serious concentration on boosting the worldwide economy. The counterparts, however, strongly argue that economic increase may lead to environmental issues, as a consequence, it should be considered to slow down. The following paragraphs intend to delve into both negative and positive effects and offer the own point of view.
On the one hand, there is no denied to say that economic development may result in global environmental damages. Take air pollution as a good example, scores of factories have to consume a large proportion of fossil fuel due to the increase in productivity. As a result, the more fuel they burn, the worse pollution becomes. Moreover, the exhausted fumes, which were released into the atmosphere from the factories, contribute to ozone depletion and other further issues. Besides, untreated water, which was directly discharged into the rivers and lakes, from the industrial parks might cause serious water pollution and threaten the residents' and aquatic creatures' lives. In addition, economic expansion could lengthen the gap between poverty and wealth. Because of these mentioned negative impacts, many people suppose that economic growth should be regarded to stop.
On the other hand, it is true to claim that commercial extension is the most desirable solution to deal with starvation and shortage. First of all, with strong finance, the government have the ability to tackle the consequences of natural disasters such as reconstructing the facilities or catering to the victims' needs. Secondly, if the government has less center on economic enlargement, it may cause a severe backfire. For instance, if the authorities have minor financial support to cater to the citizens' demands such as education, health care, or the retirement pension, this will inevitably lead to ill-literally, diseases, and crime. As a result, this would provoke hunger and poverty. Last but not least, boosting the economy could create numerous advantages, which may not only solve the basic needs of humans but also provide opportunities to improve the lives better.
In conclusion, the aforementioned pros and cons display that there are strengths and weaknesses regarding financial expansion. However, the drawbacks are more likely to pale in comparison to the benefits. Personally, I strongly believe that economic growth plays a crucial role to end up famine and insufficiency.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 30, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'denied saying'.
Suggestion: denied saying
...f view. On the one hand, there is no denied to say that economic development may result in...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, however, if, may, moreover, regarding, second, secondly, so, then, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, first of all, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2113.0 1615.20841683 131% => OK
No of words: 389.0 315.596192385 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43187660668 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44106776838 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95007280146 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 237.0 176.041082164 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609254498715 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 666.0 506.74238477 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.9109923061 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.210526316 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4736842105 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5789473684 7.06120827912 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188766697061 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0490434667862 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0566720389408 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100738599465 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0367743987194 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.78 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 127.0 78.4519038076 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.