Some individuals claim that hand-held phones ought to be prohibited in public venues including libraries, shopping centers, and public vehicles. This essay disagrees that using phones should be restricted in these places. This is unrealistic as some phone calls are urgent and every person has become reliant on phones.
Nowadays, every individual receives critical phone calls at least once in a while and they should be answered urgently. In other words, today, both personal and professional lives are highly dependent on mobile devices, through which people perform most of their tasks. Put simply, a phone conversation can be either regarding an accidental death of a loved one or related to an urgent issue at the workplace. For instance, the employees of the top management of most Sri Lankan industries work online, and therefore they need to respond to every call they receive. If they cannot be contacted anytime, it would be a big issue for their professions.
In addition, smartphones are increasingly being used for everyday tasks; therefore, people need them all day. Not only do people shop online, but they find routes to destinations, fix appointments, reserve tickets, and read books irrespective of where they are. Furthermore, students prepare for their exams and writers produce pieces of writing while they are on a bus. For example, in some Sri Lankan universities, reading materials are available only in digital versions. Therefore, citizens should have access to their phones everywhere.
In conclusion, this essay disagrees with banning mobile phone access at public places because of the urgency of some phone calls and the reliance of people on phones for their daily tasks.
- The given graph shows the nitrogen oxide emissions produced by four vehicles 67
- Some companies have uniforms for their staff which must be worn at all time What are the advantages for a company of having a uniform Are there any benefit of having uniform for a staff 73
- Some people think it is more important to spend money on roads and motorways than on publictransport systems To what extend do you agree 73
- This bar chart shows the number of private cars in millions of different cities from 1950 to 2000 Write a report 73
- The tables give information on the temperatures and the hours of daylight in two particular cites in the same week in May 2007 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, regarding, so, therefore, while, at least, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1442.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32103321033 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.766592708 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.616236162362 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 450.0 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.6892310051 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.0 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3571428571 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.57142857143 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276909240988 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0933990219716 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0845766236867 0.0667982634062 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196061103944 0.151304729494 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.093922255638 0.056905535591 165% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.