The maps show improvements that have been made to a university campus between 2010 and the present day Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The maps illustrate the changes that have occurred in university premises from2010 to the present.

Overall, the outstanding feature is the alterations that have been made to the student accommodation facilities. In addition, several major changes have been made to the infrastructure.

In terms of the accommodation, in 2010, there were 2 blocks on either side of the road, which runs from the northeast to the southwest. 2 new blocks have been constructed, one is in the southeast and another one is next to the old block, which is left to the road. The block, which was right to the road, is no longer an accommodation, instead, it has been expanded to house student facilities, such as shops and offices; therefore, 2 shops and the restaurant, which were in the east and southeast respectively, were demolished.

Concerning the other facilities, the university offices in the north have been converted into a science building and the teaching block is now dedicated to arts only. Noticeably, the lawn and the seating area around the lake, which is in the center of the facility, have been removed and a new road, which runs from the southeast to the center, has been built. However, the lake has been remained unchanged over the period.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, so, therefore, in addition, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 7.0 271% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1041.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 209.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98086124402 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93043354535 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511961722488 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 311.4 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.5652977106 43.030603864 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.666666667 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2222222222 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.88888888889 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161432143208 0.215688989381 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0839713104114 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0533102235667 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127350534072 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0569319098898 0.0819641961636 69% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.