Some people say that the most important thing for being rich is people have opportunity for helping other person ? Do you agree or disagree?

RICH PEOPLE HAVE POTENTIAL TO HELP OTHERS AS THEY HAVE SURPLUS MONEY. A SECTION OF SOCIETY BELIEVES THAT WEALTHY COMMUNITIES HAVE CAPABILITY TO HELP POOR BUT FEW MONEYED MAN ARE REALIZING
TO LEND A HAND TO ANOTHER NEEDY PERSON. THIS ESSAY WILL SCRUTINIZE FACTS WITH REASONS.

TO EMBARK WITH, PROSPEROUS SOCIETY SPEND THEIR MONEY ON LUXURY, SUCH AS GRAND PARTIES, FOREIGN TOUR TRIPS, FIVE STAR ACCOMMODATION AND OTHER EXPENSIVE PERSONAL ACCESSORIES INSTEAD HELP TO POOR CHILDREN TO STUDY AND PROVIDE THEM FOOD. FOR INSTANCE, RECENTLY AAJTAK NEW CHANNEL HAD SHOWN THAT ONE JEWELLERY BUSINESSMAN SPENT 10 CRORE ON HIS DAUGHTERS MARRIAGE CEREMONY. TO ILLUSTRATE A HUGE NUMBER OF SEGMENT OF EVEN NEVER LIKE TO TALK WITH NEEDY PERSON, THEY HAVE THOUGHT THAT TALKING WITH DOWN CLASS SOCIETY WOULD BE EFFECTS ON THEIR STATUS. FOR INSTANCE, MILLIONAIRES SHARE WITH OTHER MILLIONAIRE.

EVERY PERSON HAS DIFFERENT WAY OF THINKING. SOME WEALTHY PEOPLE ARE HELPING POOR AND ORGANIZATION IN DIFFERENT WAYS. MOST OF the RICH PEOPLE DONATES CHARITY WITHOUT SHOW THEIR NAME. FOR EXAMPLE, RECENTLY "TIME OF INDIA" HAD SHOWN THAT ONE STRANGER DONATE 3 CRORE TO ONPHANGE FOR THOSE CHILDREN WHO WANT TO PURSUE THEIR STUDY. TO MORE PRECISE RICH PEOPLE HAVE RICE FRIENDS AND SOME TIME THEY CONVINCE THEM IN MANY WAYS TO HELP OTHERS.BUT VERY FEW OF THEM ARE DONATING TO OTHERS TO HELP OTHERWISE CERTAIN EVEN DO NOT LIKE TO NTRACT WITH NORMAL PEOPLE.

TO CONCLUDE, AFFICIANT PEOPLE, HAVE TO SPREAD CHARITY TO HELPLESS RATHER THAN WASTE ON EXPENSIVE EXPERIMENT.

Votes
Average: 8.7 (3 votes)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 130, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...Y BELIEVES THAT WEALTHY COMMUNITIES HAVE CAPABILITY TO HELP POOR BUT FEW MONEYED ...
^^
Line 1, column 176, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...BILITY TO HELP POOR BUT FEW MONEYED MAN ARE REALIZING TO LEND A HAND TO ANOTHER NEEDY PERSON...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 327, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'CRORE' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'crores'.
Suggestion: Crores
...THAT ONE JEWELLERY BUSINESSMAN SPENT 10 CRORE ON HIS DAUGHTERS MARRIAGE CEREMONY. TO...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 557, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...E EFFECTS ON THEIR STATUS. FOR INSTANCE, MILLIONAIRES SHARE WITH OTHER MILLIONAIR...
^^
Line 6, column 76, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...HINKING. SOME WEALTHY PEOPLE ARE HELPING POOR AND ORGANIZATION IN DIFFERENT WAYS....
^^
Line 6, column 269, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'CRORE' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'crores'.
Suggestion: Crores
...s; HAD SHOWN THAT ONE STRANGER DONATE 3 CRORE TO ONPHANGE FOR THOSE CHILDREN WHO WANT...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 454, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun OF seems to be countable; consider using: 'FEW '.
Suggestion: FEW
...EM IN MANY WAYS TO HELP OTHERS.BUT VERY FEW OF THEM ARE DONATING TO OTHERS TO HELP OT...
^^^^^^
Line 6, column 488, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... VERY FEW OF THEM ARE DONATING TO OTHERS TO HELP OTHERWISE CERTAIN EVEN DO NOT LI...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, well, for example, for instance, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1318.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 251.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25099601594 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5354426417 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.645418326693 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 402.3 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.6026868548 49.4020404114 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.384615385 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3076923077 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.07692307692 7.06120827912 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.298025934833 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104234558853 0.084324248473 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0748449469933 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136210465969 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0998893964091 0.056905535591 176% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.99 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.