Some people opine that music is a good choice for uniting people who come from different culture and age background. I completely agree with the statement that music can be advantageous in joining people together.
Firstly, this is because music serves as a common interest between people. It does not matter where people come from or how old they are, music can always be something that unite all of them. This is because music can be enjoyed by different kind of people. For instance, many people become fans of Queen band, ranging from young to old people. As a result, when these people meet, they can talk about Queen band and their songs, despite of their age and cultural differences. A lot of them also become acquainted and befriended because of this common interest.
Secondly, it is because music is often used to send a message to people. The messages are usually reflected through the lyrics and words in the music. Then the listeners will understand what the writers want to say, and many of them can also relate to them. Consequently, many of the listeners then will do something like what is being said by the writers through their songs. For example, a band named LANY wrote song which is titled ILYSB, to express their feelings to their loved ones, which are reflected in their lyrics. As a result, many of their listeners, use that song to convey their feeling to the people whom they love.
In conclusion, I completely agree that music can be beneficial in uniting people together because music serves as a common interest between people and music can be used as a communication bridge.
Votes
- Some people say that music is a good way of bringing people of different cultures and ages together Do you agree or disagree 73
- The plans below show the layout of a university s sports centre now and how it will look after redevelopment 67
- The plans below show the layout of a university's sports centre now, and how it will look after redevelopment.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices To what extent do you agree or disagree to this statement 73
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, then, for example, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1344.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44693686065 2.80592935109 87% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 176.041082164 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.496428571429 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 417.6 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.0059927219 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.6 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6666666667 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263585296229 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0946167589721 0.084324248473 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0982055229262 0.0667982634062 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208751611473 0.151304729494 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.121492884005 0.056905535591 213% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.0946893788 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.58950901804 87% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 78.4519038076 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.