Some people say that music is a good way of bringing people of different cultures and ages together Do you agree or disagree

Some people opine that music is a good choice for uniting people who come from different culture and age background. I completely agree with the statement that music can be advantageous in joining people together.

Firstly, this is because music serves as a common interest between people. It does not matter where people come from or how old they are, music can always be something that unite all of them. This is because music can be enjoyed by different kind of people. For instance, many people become fans of Queen band, ranging from young to old people. As a result, when these people meet, they can talk about Queen band and their songs, despite of their age and cultural differences. A lot of them also become acquainted and befriended because of this common interest.

Secondly, it is because music is often used to express feelings. This is because, a lot of people are often scared or shy to say something directly to a person. Many of them then use music that has relatable message to express their feelings to certain people. As a result, many people who come from different age and cultural background can be united through music which has helped them to express their feelings to someone. For example, a band named RAN produced a song called Pandangan Pertama which contains a message about liking someone at first sight. Many people, including teenagers and adults have used this song to express their feeling to their crushes. This song has helped them to say what they are afraid to say.

In conclusion, I completely agree that music can be beneficial in uniting people together because music serves as a common interest between people and music is often used to express feelings.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, then, for example, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1416.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84931506849 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40949909105 2.80592935109 86% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 176.041082164 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.472602739726 0.561755894193 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 443.7 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.1087595907 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.5 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.25 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.25 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282328155266 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105716770684 0.084324248473 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0998379734458 0.0667982634062 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.2325920399 0.151304729494 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103854321843 0.056905535591 183% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.0946893788 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.4 8.58950901804 86% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 78.4519038076 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.