Some people say that school should concentrate on teaching students academic subject that will be useful for their future careers. Others say that subject such as music and sports are also necessary. Discuss both view and give your opinion.
It is commonly thought that placing heavy emphasis on core subjects than non - academic subjects has a major implication for future careers. Other people, however, argue that athletic and artistic fields also play an important part. Personally, I lean toward to the latter.
On the one hand, disciplines like sports and music shouldn’t be discounted for many reasons. First, non-academic subjects may not directly helpful in securing employment but it can make a candidate more employable. In today's modern society, firms are increasingly looking for those who have beyond the technical expertise and qualifications than those who do not, due to the giving precedence to attributes such as adaptability, creativity and collaborative skills. In some cases, applicants are arguably better in experience such as playing music, competing in team sports instead of having an excellent college qualification. Second, when non-academic subjects are taught at school, it allows young talents in athletic and artistic fields to be discovered. For example, Those who are endowed with an aptitude for sports or music will be desire the chance to achieve their full potential if they have opportunities to participate in these acts.
On the other hand, academic subjects seem to be a more crucial and foremost objective of students attending school to have a financially viable career path in the future. To this end, the bulk of curriculums should be dedicated to core subjects like Literature, Mathematics, Foreign language or maybe sometimes it can involve both Physic and Chemistry, because those performances are placed heavy emphasis by high school students. For instance, students tend to prioritize those subjects having attendance to their major to find the way to university more straightforward.
In conclusion, I believe both the arguments have their merits. On balance, however, it seems that non - academic subjects should be taught in a balanced way with academic subjects. This is because it allows students to identify and achieve their full potential.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-03 | Phuongzunne | 84 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, may, second, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in some cases, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1749.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.465625 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02395978485 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590625 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 548.1 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.3797611419 49.4020404114 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.6 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.13333333333 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.31563477591 0.244688304435 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0991310888851 0.084324248473 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.048215996185 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188321007245 0.151304729494 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0261021851443 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.