Some people say that web content should be used to instruct children. Others think that it is not helpful in an educational setting.
It is a common belief that the internet is unhelpful and even harmful in school environments. However, there is a more persuasive argument that children might be instructed by the diverse and intuitive information contained in web content through proper usage.
On the one hand, early internet exposure in young children may lead to potentially deviated conceptions and thinking. This is because there are many unreliable and toxic contents that are widely disseminated online, while children are too young to perceive problems objectively. For example, children today are more likely to use rude words and discourteous gestures, even when addressing their parents and teachers. They often learn those words and behavior from social media and other websites, where such language is popular.
However, if we teach children how to use web content correctly and responsibly, it can be a useful tool for learning and exploring the world. In fact, the internet is the fastest way to connect with a huge treasure trove of human knowledge, in which there is no shortage of visual examples of images and sounds representing the concepts taught to children in educational settings. And learning from such intuitive cases is always more accessible than from abstract theories. One clearly stated instance is that children tend to remember new vocabulary longer from videos and images instead of studying it in several books.
To sum up, while it is apparent that harmful information is still widely distributed in web content and might have a negative impact on children's conception, it is undeniable that the internet plays an important role as a good source for learning and visualizing knowledge at school if we help children utilize it selectively.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, so, still, while, for example, in fact, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1473.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27956989247 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84509708231 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602150537634 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 462.6 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.9721954956 49.4020404114 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.909090909 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3636363636 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.54545454545 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224123620721 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0742823821082 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0671759509765 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131891608601 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0181734231621 0.056905535591 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.