Schools are designed to prepare children to adulthood. Nevertheless, an inevitable part of adult life tend to be work whose aspects are not taken into consideration in school programs. Many people assert that students should be involved in work in order to improve their understanding of the notion of labour. While there are many reasons to criticize this viewpoint, I entirely agree with it due to the benefits such as profit and experience.
One key advantage of involving school students in part-time jobs is that they can become breadwinning members of their families. This is because any work is rewarding and even though students’ salaries are seemingly a mere amount, they can contribute to the family budget and assist their families in collecting means to cover future university tuition fees and other personal expenses. It also may develop the character of the family breadwinner, which is essential in the adult lives of young people. Therefore, the habit of earning money, which can be gained at schools without disruption from studying, is crucial to make students conscious about value of money earned.
Furthermore, it is beneficial that those who performed small works at school make use of experience which they receive while working. This is due to the fact that experience at work can help them define what job they will opt and adaptation process to adult life will probably go more smoothly. By working in various spheres, for instance, students would presumably have a clear view of what kind of profession will suit their skills. Thus, students exposed to work at schools tend to be more prepared and precise about their future careers.
In conclusion, while some people argue that working part-time can possibly interrupt school students from their studies, I am certain that its benefits, such as obtaining a clearer understanding of money and future job, explicitly outweigh its drawbacks. I feel that students are to be given more freedom to make them more independent people in lives.
- The diagram below shows how electricity is generated in a hydroelectric power station Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The chart below gives information on the percentage of Canadians gave money to charitable organisations by age range for the years 2000 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main f 100
- In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railways lines for very fast trains between cities, Others believe the money should be spent on improving public transport,Discuss both of these v 78
- Better driver education for better driving habits is more effective than heavier punishments for driving offenses To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- As most people spend a major part of their adult life at work, job satisfaction is an important element of individual wellbeing.What are the factors that contribute to job satisfaction?How realistic is the expectation of job satisfaction for all workers? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 63, Rule ID: MAY_COULD_POSSIBLY[1]
Message: Use simply 'can'.
Suggestion: can
...ome people argue that working part-time can possibly interrupt school students from their st...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, may, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, while, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1702.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 329.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17325227964 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76944901371 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577507598784 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 521.1 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.9715060878 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.571428571 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.14285714286 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177412899632 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0672192919083 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0377579764645 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118961474966 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0370922185387 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.