Some people support the development of factory farming and the science creation of fruits and vegetables in agriculture, but others oppose to these developments. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
The farming methods are nowadays hotly debated. While many people think that mechanicalizing farming is good, others believe the traditional one is better.
On the first hand, applying technology and science on growing helps to increase the productivity. To be specific, machines replace buffalos or cows in ploughing and the alike, allow farmers to harvest faster with tractors or dozers. Furthermore, fertilizers and pesticides can shorten the growing process with less vermins and grass. The seeds that the scientists invent also make the plants more adaptive to the environment and therefore provides better products.
On the other hand, the opponents of the ideas also have their own reasons. There are scientific proof showing that traditionally grown plants, vegetables have higher nutrition than the ones that are grown by the factories. In condition to this, the organic products are safe to the sensitive people since there has been no pesticides used on them. As a result, it is suitable for people that is allergic to these.
In conclusion, obviously both views are reasonable, however, I believe that the traditionally grown plants are better as they are safer and more nutritious.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2018-03-02 | chew chew | 56 | view |
2017-12-09 | Neha mehta | 56 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, while, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 41.998997996 45% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1009.0 1615.20841683 62% => OK
No of words: 189.0 315.596192385 60% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33862433862 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 4.20363070211 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83795240498 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 176.041082164 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.650793650794 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 313.2 506.74238477 62% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.2327131474 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.7272727273 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1818181818 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.63636363636 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116625480891 0.244688304435 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0415338271204 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0352277959487 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0693606872437 0.151304729494 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0364505657408 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.58 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.