Some people think that the age limit for driving should be increased to make driving safer, do you agree or disagree?
Recent decades have witnessed an upsurge in the number of people succumbing to road accidents, raising many questions of transportation regulations. Although the proposal of increasing the driving age limit sounds reasonable, it is not without much more practical and effective measures.
On the one hand, there are a multitude of reasons why official authorities should increase the legal age for driving. First, Young individuals’ immaturity is invariably associated with their overconsumption of alcohols when it comes to driving. Subsequently the likelihood of fatal accidents is inevitable as their brain is negatively affected by the stimulus chemicals from alcohols. Second, young people are usually irresponsible for causing accidents and neglect their duties of compensating for the victims. Actually, the majority of hit-and-run cases all go to the young generation which could be attributed to their fear of financial burdens and imprisonment.
On the other hand, governments should undertake many initiatives with higher efficiency to crack down on this driving issue. First, More capital investments in the improvement of transportation infrastructure should be encouraged. In fact, the deterioration of unfunded road systems and bridges has culminated in its collapse, killing hundreds of drivers. In addition, official authorities should impose heavier punishment on drivers causing accidents. It is implied that this legislation would make people drive with higher degree of responsibility and carefulness as they take the heavy fine into consideration.
In conclusion, lifting the legal driving age is not a feasible measure despite some drawbacks of young people’s irresponsibility. Additionally, governments and drivers should cooperated to find the best approach into this safety problem.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-01-04 | Pau Nguyen | 78 | view |
| 2017-06-22 | grahamoneil | 92 | view |
- Some people think it is more important to spend public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle in order to prevent illness than to spend it on the treatment for people who are already ill To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Some people think that developing countries need financial help from international organizations. Other think that it is practical aid and advice that is needed. Discuss these views and give your own opinion. 84
- Some people think that zoos are all cruel and should be closed down Others however believe that zoos can be useful in protecting wild animals Discuss both opinions and give your own opinion 100
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries but it does not solve poverty Therefore developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Some people say that it is impossible for a country to br both economically successful and have a clean environment. Others disagree. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 92
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 251, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Subsequently,
...n of alcohols when it comes to driving. Subsequently the likelihood of fatal accidents is in...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, if, second, so, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1567.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 263.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.95817490494 5.12529762239 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.41803735635 2.80592935109 122% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.634980988593 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 484.2 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 17.8462824117 49.4020404114 36% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 111.928571429 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7857142857 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.57142857143 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254731659219 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0749934836772 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.063933716445 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142551438272 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.02220836811 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.29 12.4159519038 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.53 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.