Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Numerous individuals assume that all university learners are supposed to learn something which they are fond of, nevertheless, others consider that they are solely supposed to be permitted to study about subjects which are fruitful for the future, such as related to science and technology. In accordance with this argument, this essay will explain both points of view and also put forward my perspective in the following paragraphs.
In regard to the opinion above, several individuals urge to all students to take a study that will create more positive influence to the future. They do believe that it, first and foremost, is going to render an improved development of all aspects since the students took crucial subjects that are capable of producing countless strengths. Second but not less crucial, it is apparent that they do not be anxious about the future circumstances since numerous juveniles have more focussing on improving an improved quality of technology and science.
Regarding my perspective, I tend to agree to other argument which consider that it is better for all learners to study about something that they would love to learn. Moreover, I firmly believe that conferring a freedom for all students to select subjects that they are fond of will produce more benefits rather than insisting students to take something that they disliked just because of the sake of the better future, because I think that everything that have been done by freedom will produce more positive outcomes in the end.
By way of conclusion, it seems to me that bestowing a freedom to learn about subjects that they love to learn is better rather than insist them to take something that they are not interested. Thus, we, as older people, are better provide a guidance for the youths about something which is better for them.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-04-25 | ulligadda sreeja | 56 | view |
- The bar chart shows the computer ownership by education level, 2002 & 2010. 78
- the pie charts and table give information about the total value of fish imported to the us between 1988 and 2000. 73
- Essay topics: Line graph : Clothing Export in 1999 - 2003 in Japan, Colombia and Myanmar. 73
- Bar Chart : The chart below shows the percentage of people who ate five portions of fruit and vegetables per day in the UK from 2001 to 2008. 78
- The map shows the change in Jakarta (1950 – 2000). 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 210, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'freedom'.
Suggestion: freedom
...eover, I firmly believe that conferring a freedom for all students to select subjects tha...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 53, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'freedom'.
Suggestion: freedom
...nclusion, it seems to me that bestowing a freedom to learn about subjects that they love ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, moreover, nevertheless, regarding, second, so, thus, i think, such as, in regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 20.0 7.30460921844 274% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 39.0 24.0651302605 162% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1528.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05960264901 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64692799241 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.503311258278 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 479.7 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 20.2975951904 163% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 74.6249883678 49.4020404114 151% => OK
Chars per sentence: 169.777777778 106.682146367 159% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.5555555556 20.7667163134 162% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.2222222222 7.06120827912 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273986339801 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113190546622 0.084324248473 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0743811935963 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170977818846 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0756649254905 0.056905535591 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.2 13.0946893788 147% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.98 50.2224549098 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.66 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.1190380762 150% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.