Bar Chart : Employment rates, by country, 1995 – 2005.
The figure elucidates the percentage of employment in six different nations between 1995 and 2005. At first glance, it is evident that all states experienced a significant upsurge for the number of employment for males and females.
To begin with, 1995 to 2005 witnessed a remarkable growth in which initially, it stood at more than a half and achieved at just below seven-tenths. Furthermore, the amount of females employment in Switzerland is higher rather than the other countries, which made up approximately at well below two-thirds over the following years.
In accordance with the number of males employment, Iceland had the highest percentage of male employment from 1995, which was at just over 7 in 10, through to 2005, which constituted at just across four-fifths. According to other countries, the rates of males’ employment in Australia, Switzerland, the UK, New Zealand, USA, which roughly at well below eight-tenths in 1995 and in 2005, are lower rather than the percentage of males employment in Iceland.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-10 | nobitaa | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | nobitaa | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-04 | khanhkhanhlhp | view | |
| 2024-11-04 | khanhkhanhlhp | view | |
| 2024-11-04 | khanhkhanhlhp | view |
- Government should focus spending only on public services, not waste on the arts. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- The only way to improve road safety is to give much stricter punishments on driving offences. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- International travel is becoming cheaper, and more and more countries open their door and with more and more tourists.Do the advantages of the increased tourism outweigh its disadvantages? 67
- The maps : summarise the changes to Liverpool john moores university from 2010 to 2016. 61
- The graph below gives information from Annual Energy Outlook 2008 about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projection until 2030. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, third, well, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 868.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29268292683 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10413169042 2.65546596893 117% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.579268292683 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 251.1 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.2350032901 43.030603864 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.666666667 112.824112599 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.3333333333 22.9334400587 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 5.23603664747 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182786912603 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111756806782 0.103423049105 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0623181764433 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138870107912 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0353746856072 0.0819641961636 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.2329268293 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.